Navigation

 • BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also welcome.

Site Information
 
• What is Black Champagne?
 
• Cast of Characters/Things
 • Your First Time
 • Design Notes
 • Quote of the Day Archive
 • Phrase of the Moment Archive
 • Site Feedback
 • Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
 • Blogger Archives: June 2005-present
 • Old Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
  • Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
  • The Protector -- 6
  • The Limey -- 8
  • The Descent -- 6
  • Oldboy -- 9.5
  • Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
  • Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
  • Chase Step by Step -- 7.5
  • V is for Vendetta -- 8.5
  • Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 6
  • Night Watch -- 7.5
Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
 • Cat People, by Michael Korda -- 4
 • Attack Poodles, by James Wolcott -- 5
 • Caught Stealing, by Charlie Huston -- 6
 • The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
 • Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos and Captions
 • Flux Photos
 • Pet Photos (7 pages)
 • Home Decor Photos
 • Plant Photos
 • Vacation Photos (21 pages)

Articles Section
See all 234 Articles

Fiction
Original fantasy and horror short stories.

Mail Bags
 • Index Page

Features
 
• Links
 • Slang: Internet
 • Slang: Dirty
 • Slang: Wankisms
 • Slang: Sex Acts
 • Slang: Fulldeckisms
 • Hot or Not?
 • Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ • Feedback
A • B • C • D • E
F • G • H • I • J • K
L • M • N • O • P
Q • R • S • T • U
V • W • X • Y • Z

Diablo II
 • The Unofficial Site
 • Flux's Decahedron
 • Middle Earth Mod

 

 

The Peacemaker
Genre: Thriller
Acting : 7 
Script: 6.5
Replayability: 6
Overall: 7
esides sounding like The Pacemaker, which would be a lot less interesting movie, I'm not sure why this film wasn't more successful.  It looks great, has two big stars, and wasn't that poorly-reviewed. Yet it only made $41m when released in 1998.

I didn't see it then, and I didn't see it on video.  I only saw it when it was on one of the major TV networks in early 2002, but I found it compelling enough to sit through the commercials and keep watching it, which is very unusual for me.

It's basically a James Bond movie with less going on that's therefore a lot more realistic.  There are stolen Russian nukes, attempts to smuggle them to some other unknown country, high tech intercept efforts, chases around the world, arguing commanders, and the eventual cat and mouse nuke chase around NYC.  It does not have the glib humor (or attempts at it, anyway) of the typical Bond film, and there's no sex or charismatic super villain.  I actually preferred the villain they had, since he was nuts and haunted by inner demons of his slaughtered wife and child, and the bad guys didn't have a secret base with private moon shuttle flights, or own half the world, etc.  They were small timers working on their own, trying to make a huge thing happen against the odds.  The good guys had the resources and the battle was on their home turf; a much more realistic scenario than the typical James Bond thing with him alone in some underground metropolis entirely-filled with the bad guys' henchmen.

The main conflict, besides the nuke-smuggling terrorist, is between Clooney and Kidman.  She's a by the book high-ranking intelligence official.  He's some sort of special forces army colonel, very "cowboy" and wanting to just take off and do things.  He has past history with the head bad guy terrorist's security officer, so there's a personal angle there as well.

There is the inevitable scene where Kidman has to give the okay to launch a big risky mission that Clooney really wants to charge off on.  And she goes against her training and is won over by his enthusiasm and the seriousness of the situation.  It turns out to be somewhat of a disaster, in an example of the relatively intelligent script/plot.

Overall, the movie was a lot smarter than the average spy thriller.  Not a series of improbable and physics-defying escapades like a Bond movie, and not just one lone guy able to do anything and everything.

 

I did not know the movie was on, and only happened upon it in a rare moment of channel surfing.  I clicked to it when there was a car chase, more like a car battle, in some quaint city square in Italy or some country that looks like it.  There were two or three cars of bad guys chasing Clooney and Kidman in their one car.  What caught my eye was not the screeching tires, but that the scene starts with Kidman diving between the front and back seat, for no apparent reason.

Well actually the reason was apparent, it was because she had a mini-skirt on and it gave them a chance to show several lingering shots of her upper thighs as she wriggled around.  It was about the only sex appeal in the entire film, at least until the very end (see below) but given that I have somewhat of a vested interest in Nicole's thighs, I was interested enough to stay with it.

The car scene was interesting since it started as a chase, but ended as a demolition derby, with Clooney destroying both of the terrorist's cars in semi-realistic fashion.  Through the whole movie Clooney's character was well done.  Very strong and competent and street smart.  Able to take full advantage of the technology and opportunities he had available, and using realistic tactics and technology, rather than some magical gizmo, like Bond.

There is a nice scene at the end where they are after the terrorist in NYC.  They spend some time figuring out that he's actually in the country, how he might have gotten in, talking about the lack of sufficient radiation detectors to pick up the nuke in NYC, etc.  They get to his hotel room just after he's left, which Clooney figures out by feeling his plate of room service eggs and seeing that they are still warm.  Nice touch.

Then ensues a frantic chase as they try to spot the guy and his cargo somewhere in Manhattan, as he's approaching the UN.  It's well done with cars of cops and military everywhere, streets being closed off just a minute too late, huge traffic jams, multiple snipers scanning the masses of people, and the eventual mad chase after he's spotted.

The biggest failing of the film is that Nicole does nothing. She wears a lot of suits and snaps off orders, but why hire one of the most beautiful women in acting and put her in pants suits for two hours?  She does have that one mini-skirt in the car bit, but that was clearly a stretch.  No shower scenes, no ripped dresses, none of the normal movie invention to show off the sexy female.

A nice touch at the end was that she, not Clooney, is the nuke expert, and she does the dirty work to disarm it before the ultimate clichι, the red number countdown, reaches zero.  They dive through a stained glass window, all disaster is averted, and the movie fades to black with them hugging each other, all scratched and at last feeling bonded, after butting heads the entire time.  You think the movie is over, and without a bit of Nicole-skin.  Bah.

But no!

The black fades, and we see an underwater shot of a woman swimming over in a black one-piece suit. Yes, it's Nicole, milky thighs a'flashing, in the most tacked on and gratuitous display of female flesh you'll find this side of of the SI Swimsuit Issue.  Tragically she's not wearing a suit worthy of inclusion in that magazine (more like Lands' End) but hey, at least they got her into a suit of some kind.  I laughed my ass off at the time, since I'd spent the last hour trading sarcastic ICQs with a female friend, mostly bemoaning the ratio of long pants to Nicole's legs.  The movie ended, it faded to black, and just as all hope for some skin fades, when it's darkest before the dawn... salvation.

The scene is dumb on several levels.  Nicole is there swimming laps, and Clooney walks in wearing his full dress uniform, medals and epaulets galore, and stands on the side of the pool while Nicole swims towards him.  They have a "well I'm glad that's all over with" conversation, and then he sort of asks her to go get a beer, and she says okay but she's got like 10 laps to go first, and swims away, giving the camera a slight look at her butt.

The point of this little recount is that you should never forget men run Hollywood, and create the movies to be what they want to see.  No matter how serious and professional and competent the female character is, if she's hot we'll almost always see her in a swimsuit or panties or the shower, sooner or later. And if not the male half of the audience will be muffling curses and complaining about it on ICQ. *cough*

Imagine if the ending had an underwater shot of George swimming in a Speedo, and Nicole walked out in her smart cream pantsuit and eyeballed him, and asked him out on a date?  And the camera lingered over his washboard stomach, manly pecs, and Speedo bulging like he was smuggling golf balls...  No, I can't imagine it either.  Just because it would never happen in a Hollywood film, at least not while heterosexual men are running things, and making movies as they want to see them, and thinking that they are their own biggest audience.

Skin or lack thereof aside, the film was pretty good, a lot better than I expected, and I would recommend it.

Originally posted in the update April 7, 2002. Expanded and archived here October 21, 2002.

 

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.