Navigation

 BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also welcome.

Site Information
 
What is Black Champagne?
 
Cast of Characters/Things
 Your First Time
 Design Notes
 Quote of the Day Archive
 Phrase of the Moment Archive
 Site Feedback
 Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
 • Blogger Archives: June 2005-present
 • Old Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
  • Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
  • The Protector -- 6
  • The Limey -- 8
  • The Descent -- 6
  • Oldboy -- 9.5
  • Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
  • Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
  • Chase Step by Step -- 7.5
  • V is for Vendetta -- 8.5
  • Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 6
  • Night Watch -- 7.5
Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
 • Cat People, by Michael Korda -- 4
 • Attack Poodles, by James Wolcott -- 5
 • Caught Stealing, by Charlie Huston -- 6
 • The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
 • Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos and Captions
 • Flux Photos
 • Pet Photos (7 pages)
 • Home Decor Photos
 • Plant Photos
 • Vacation Photos (21 pages)

Articles Section
See all 234 Articles

Fiction
Original fantasy and horror short stories.

Mail Bags
 Index Page

Features
 
Links
 Slang: Internet
 Slang: Dirty
 Slang: Wankisms
 Slang: Sex Acts
 Slang: Fulldeckisms
 Hot or Not?
 Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQFeedback
A • BC • D • E
FGHIJ • K
LMNOP
Q • RSTU
V • W • XY • Z

Diablo II
 • The Unofficial Site
 • Flux's Decahedron
 • Middle Earth Mod

Books Lying Open:
¤ The Book of Five Rings, Miyamoto Musashi
¤ The Vanished Man, Jeffrey Deaver
¤ The Stone Monkey, Jeffrey Deaver
¤ Coffin Dancer, Jeffrey Deaver
¤ Empty Chair, Jeffrey Deaver

Soul-Devouring Worry:
¤ Noisy and restless felines.

Answer of the Day:
¤ Because four days without Kali get sorta long, even if they are over a weekend.

Curse of the Day:
¤ May you start off with eye of the kitten, and work your way up.

Phrase of the Moment -- PotM Archive
¤
Phrase: Duran Durantidote
¤ Usage: "I can't get that stupid song out of my head. I need a Duran Durantidote."
¤ Origin: I coined the term in early March, 2005, since it was appropriate and the name was cute.
¤ Notes: While your chances to use this exact term are (hopefully) going to be pretty limited, it will come in handy when you need it, and you can use it in a more general way, when you must hear a good song to get some hated but catchy jingle out of your head.

The term occurred to me when we found ourselves in the car two days in a row, on the way home from running some errands, and each time had goddamned Hungry Like the Wolf running through our heads after hearing it in the store we'd just left. Very different stores, too; fricking Home Depot in the second instance! Fortunately, this affliction, while annoying, can be readily cured by a quick listen to virtually any decent music. I chose Green Day on my WinAmp list the first day, and Marilyn Manson on a tape in the car the second time. -- March 9, 2005

Friday April 8, 2005
Quote of the Day -- QotD Archives
"The problem is not with people or churches that are politically active. It is with a party that has gone so far in adopting a sectarian agenda that it has become the political extension of a religious movement.

When government becomes the means of carrying out a religious program, it raises obvious questions under the First Amendment. But even in the absence of constitutional issues, a political party should resist identification with a religious movement. While religions are free to advocate for their own sectarian causes, the work of government and those who engage in it is to hold together as one people a very diverse country. At its best, religion can be a uniting influence, but in practice, nothing is more divisive. For politicians to advance the cause of one religious group is often to oppose the cause of another."
-- former Senator John C. Danforth (R), in a 2005 NYT OpEd

ovies galore below. Up here a quick bit on Kali, and maybe something else if it occurs to me in the next fifteen minutes.

 

After 7 months of martial arts training, I am now sufficiently-advanced (well, sufficient-intermediate, to be more precise) at Kali that it's no longer enough that I merely execute the maneuvers. It's expected (by me and the Gura and the other advanced students) that I do the new moves we're shown that day, and that I do them with style, grace, precision, etc.

We work on form and positioning and such all along, but it takes a while to move beyond simply trying to get your body to do the basic maneuver. Once you've got the skill to progress though, you begin to discover just how vast a difference there is between doing it tolerably, and doing it like the experts. It's also surprising how subtle the higher level movements are. Thursday night we were doing a two-strike move with a lot of footwork mixed in, and while almost everyone could do it after a few minutes of practice and/or observation, the learning curve between just doing it and doing it like a master is almost infinite.

What I found odd was what I mentioned a second ago. How tiny the changes necessary to improve at it were. Everyone realizes they need to be more fluid, to make bigger circles with their stick and their open hand, etc. What's harder to grasp is that something as small as head positioning, or finger extension, or the angle of the chin will make a huge difference. And not just to experts, who could pick out the tiny change; everyone can see it, even the most beginning students. You can do the same move ten times in thirty seconds, feel like you're doing it as well as you can, and if on the eleventh time you finally look at the fingers of your left hand, as you extend that arm over your head for balance and grace, and extend them precisely as you strike with the stick in your other hand, it 1) feels much better, 2) looks much better, and 3) makes the strike visibly and audibly harder and more precise.

It defies logic; why would looking at your fingers, actually focusing on them, make the stick in your other hand move faster and more exactly? I can't say quite why it does, but the whooshing sound of the stick cutting through the air is unmistakable, and when you watch six other people slowly learn and then finally do it correctly, and see how much better they all look when they get it right, and hear them all tell you how much better you looked when you finally did it right, it's hard to argue with reality.

On top of the body position stuff, we're not getting into the "eye of the tiger" type attitude. We don't call it that, but you've heard the term.  We go with a different movie. The King and I. Yes, an absurd musical (I think all musicals are absurd in concept, actually.) but if you ever see it, even for a little bit, study Yul Brenner's body language and facial expressions.

Here's a shot of him from that film, and looking at it, can you for a second deny that he is, in the immortal words of Jules, "One bad motherfucker?"

But analyze the photo, and your reaction to it. Why does he look so bad, rather than just looking like a short bald guy with a big earring? He's got the bald head going on, a look that few non-black men fail to look ridiculous with, and he's got great eyebrows. The way they drop down over his eyes is scary. He's doing something with his jaw too; it's very tight and lifted. But mostly it's in his eyes. There is an intensity; a fire; the eye of the tiger, if you prefer.

Of course being able to see this in others and being able to summon it up yourself is an entirely different matter, as we've been discovering lately in Kali class. Doing a series of moves with your mind neutral is one thing, but doing the same series with an inner fire lit is entirely different. The Gura and a few other experts can summon it up whenever they wish, and it's downright eerie to watch. In a blink they go from someone you know to an entirely different person. An angry, hard person, one who would not hesitate to take you out. That's how they look, anyway, and this is a look gangster types cultivate, for obvious reasons. Walk into a room glowering and exuding energy like this, and you'll definitely be noticed. I wouldn't advise it if you aren't ready to back it up, though.

It's basically acting when we do it (well, we try to do it), but at the same time it's a real feeling or emotion that's causing the look. One guy tonight who is about as good as me at Kali was doing the series of moves, and not doing it poorly, but when Gura pressed him to get intense; to really mean it, he took himself mentally into a place where he could feel like Yul looks here, and goddamn if he didn't start moving a hell of a lot better. Faster, swinging harder, improved form, etc. He wasn't all the way there; he didn't have the regal chin lift and glowering eyes, but you could see in his face that he was so much more into what his body was doing than he had been five seconds before. It didn't last long either; he couldn't sustain it and tired quickly once he was doing it, but damn it was cool while it lasted.

I can't do it, at least not yet. I get into a more intense mental state once in a while, and managed it twice Thursday night while I was doing the moves in front of everyone, but while I felt like I was almost there, it doesn't show on my face to others. It was a strange feeling though; I won't go into the meditation terms of embracing the void or holding the flame or whatever you want to call it, but I definitely lost a lot of my awareness of the surrounding room and the people watching me. And I became far more in tune with my body's movements. I couldn't hold it very well though, partially because I started to lose the footwork and move sequences once I was going for the intensity.  I felt completely connected to my weapon and there was nothing in my head but moving and striking with the stick, but I apparently went too one track in my thoughts, since I lost the cross-shaped walking pattern we were doing, and when I realized I was drifting a bit I lost the intensity.

It was sweet though, and made me want it again. And I want it all the time, not just when I'm doing Kali. Not that I'd walk around looking that way all the time, but it would be nice to hold that intensity and facial expression at the ready.

Yul Brenner's performance in The King and I is amazing since he keeps it up almost the whole time. Our Master recommends the film for Kali, not because there's any martial arts in it, but because of the way Yul holds himself. He is impossibly-regal throughout, and that is what we try to look like and how we try to hold ourselves when doing Kali. Well, the men do, most of the time at least. Women can channel this as well, depending on what they're doing, but they sometimes want to be softer or more flowing and less imperious, as do the men.

This shot of him dancing isn't a great one, since he's got his chin down and is looking where he's about to step (something we try not to do with our stick work), but his posture is still excellent. Very stiff back, right arm high and cocked, weight sliding smoothly from the right leg to the left, etc. Compare him to his dance partner, who is buried in an ocean of satin, but doesn't have any sort of intensity or look on her face. She's just following along in the dance, looking down at nothing in particular, and though the only thing we can see of her body is her arms and shoulders, they're not erect or full of energy.

And once again, I wish I had a video clip of Kali to show, since I think the difference would be very evident even over the Internet.  Although, our Gura's fiancee has filmed her a few times, and he says that some of the intensity and energy you feel in person just does not translate through the film. It's the difference between attending a rock show and watching a concert video; there's just some sort of a vibe to a live performance that doesn't travel through the video of it, except in very rare cases. Which is probably why there are about 10 actors alive today who can simply command the screen. Everyone else, talented though they may be, are just taking up space on screen.

I don't have a list, but you know it when you see it. Bruce Lee had it; watch any scene of him when he's moving or even just staring someone down and there is an energy about him that you simply don't see in everyday life. It's obviously not something every actor wants; it wouldn't come in very handy for Tom Hanks in one of his everyman romantic lead type roles, but in action movies or suspense films it's invaluable. Watch the first minute of Hopkins' performance in Silence of the Lambs, when he's simply standing in his plexiglass cell and talking to Starling, and his energy is so intense it's almost dripping off the screen.

I want to look like that. At least sometimes. Like during the photo shoot for my first book jacket picture, for instance.

 

As always, the Kali talk went far longer than anticipated.

The sad part is that I can remember my past self well enough to know that nothing I just said would have meant a damn thing to me a year ago.

"I have intensity when I need it! What does chin angle have to do with looking hardcore? Why would you fight better emulating the way a bald guy danced in an old movie?"

All that and more might have flowed forth from my mouth fingers, and therefore I can easily envision many of you thinking those things now. I'm not here to convince you otherwise; I'm just here to blog about me, and I'm not putting on a persona to do it. (Well, maybe a little bit of the Mr. Snark when it comes time to talk about celebrity bullshit.) I didn't set out with change as a goal, but I have changed some since I began taking martial arts classes last Fall. We don't spend a lot of time on it, nor do we meditate or anything like that, but there is a philosophy of sorts that comes with martial arts, when you're really doing them and not just waving your arms and legs around like the guys do in the movies. I didn't anticipate anything like that when I started doing Kali, and I'm not becoming a Buddhist or anything, but I do have different attitudes about various things than I did before I started my martial arts training. I hope that doesn't horrify anyone too terribly.

 

Anyway, I also wanted to mention the Ipod performance on Thursday. In Wednesday's blog I talked about how well the Monster plug-in sent forth radio signals that I then heard through the car stereo. Thursday was much the same, but with Malaya riding shotgun she was able to experiment some more. She found a good clear station at around 105.9, oddly enough, and she also found that by holding the actual transmitter closer to the antenna (which is on the right front of the car) we got less static and interference.

I can't hold it up there when I'm driving solo, so we're thinking about getting some of those strips that have glue on one side and velcro on the other. I'll stick a bit of velcro on the Monster transmitter, some more on the Ipod holder, and put matching pieces on the dash of my car and Malaya's car, and we'll be set. If we're smart we'll even position the Ipod so that when it's stuck on we can see the screen and easily reach the controls if we want to change songs.

Overall it's a pretty good investment so far, and we haven't even taken it to the gym yet. It certainly beats the car radio, or my increasingly-tired selection of audio tapes.

ovies! Trailers, upcoming films, trainwrecks in the making, and more.

 

¤ A few weeks ago I posted about my unexpected interest in the upcoming Spielberg/Cruise uber-film, War of the Worlds. I had no plans to see it, much less be eager to see it, but the first teaser was good and the second teaser was awesome, and now I'm interested. The only down note was the ominous frequency with which that cute little blonde girl was shown, invariably with a terrified expression and tears on her face. With another director I wouldn't worry, but Spielberg simply can't help sticking children in dangerous situations in every movie, and then letting their annoying screaming ruin all the good action scenes. Especially since you know that there's no way any of them will ever actually be consumed by the Velociraptors, or melted down as obsolete robots, or skewered by Captain Hook.

I bring this up since there's a new Japanese trailer (English spoken, with Japanese subtitles and some narration) for War of the Worlds, and sure enough, it's simply choked with shots of the cute blonde girl's tear-streaked face. Maybe that sort of thing is big in Japan, but it's almost enough to make me not want to go see the damn movie after all.  Pity Spielberg had to get old and have children and grow soft, but I guess it happens to almost all of us eventually.  Good thing he's not making Jaws now, or Rob Schneider's wide-eyed, curly-haired kid would stow away on the Orca and then every time the shark appeared there'd be a lingering shot of him (or her) clinging to dad's ankle and sobbing, while even crusty old Mr. Quint grew to like the youngster and died to protect him/her.

And yes, my views on this issue will probably one day be as changed as my views on love and dating and women were from the pre-Malaya era to today.  *sigh*

 

 

¤ In other movie news, Fever Pitch is about to open, and fail miserably, with any luck. It's another US movie that's plundered from a foreign film, in this case a movie also called Fever Pitch (Oddly, "pitch" refers to the playing surface in soccer, and the thrown ball in baseball.) that was set in England and was about a guy who was a huge soccer fan and how the girl who falls in love with him tries to reconcile her love for him with his obsession over a sporting team. The US version is about a baseball fanatic, played by Adam Sandler-lite, AKA Jimmy Fallon. He's a Red Sox fan, the girl is played by Drew Barrymore, and the hook for non-romantic comedy viewers is that the team in the movie, the Red Sox, actually won the World Series last year for the first time in like 90 years.  This miraculous event necessitated a rewrite in the plot, but the really annoying thing is that they were filming the movie during the playoff games, and, as critic Sean Burns says in an otherwise-unremarkable review in the Philadelphia Weekly:

...this past October Steve and I found ourselves running amok through the streets of our hometown, hugged by strangers while an ecstatic throng surrounding us danced on bars, bought rounds to toast their long-departed Sox-fan ancestors and occasionally paused to ask: "What the Christ are Jimmy Fallon and Drew Barrymore doing on the field with our team?"

I'm not a Red Sox fan and I'm certainly not a Jimmy Fallon or Drew Barrymore fan, and even I noticed them dancing around on the field during the World Series celebrations, though for me it was more of an, "Isn't that Drew Barrymore and that comedian guy I saw once in an SNL promo? What are they doing on the field?" I wouldn't have had any interest in the film anyway, but after I saw them out there, forever tainting the should-have-been glorious celebration of the Red Sox's epic triumph, I've assumed this film would earn about $8 in all of New England, just since every real Red Sox fan hates it for the sin of letting those two idiots out on the field during the post game celebration.

Maybe sheer nostalgia for the World Series win will carry over though, and Red Sox fans won't be able to keep themselves from buying a ticket, if only so they can enjoy the win all over again, while trying their hardest to look at the celebrating players and not at the hugging and kissing and happily-ever-after'ing Fallon and Barrymore?

 

 

¤ I'm not entirely sure this isn't a bit of delayed April Fools' news, but anyway, the actor chosen to be the new James Bond is apparently official. And it's no one anyone's ever heard of:

LONDON (AFP) - The producers of the hugely successful James Bond film franchise have chosen British actor Daniel Craig to take over the role of the suave super-spy, a report said.

The 37-year-old has been offered a three-film deal by Bond producer Barbara Broccoli and is expected to sign up formally in the next few weeks, The Sun newspaper reported Wednesday.

Craig, a tough-looking character actor who has mixed up appearances in many art-house titles with roles in blockbusters such as "Lara Croft: Tomb Raider", just beat fellow Briton Clive Owen for the role, the report said

Who? Exactly.

I'm no casting director, but isn't one prerequisite that a James Bond actor not be fugly? And old? Well, Sean Connery was doing them in his 50s, so maybe age isn't such a requirement. But looks are; the man has got to pull off the dashing hero in a tuxedo look, and I know they can work miracles with movie makeup, but seriously, why hire a guy who needs one?

There are lots more pics of the guy on his IMDB profile, but they don't improve things much.

Craig looks younger in the above shots shots from 2002 and 2003, but rather jug-eared, and generally pretty morose. I have no personal stake in the James Bond franchise, and I know the producers are cheap, greedy, and short-sighted, but damn... they may have shot the golden goose here, rather than paying Brosnan for a few more mega-hits, or taking the obvious Clive Owen choice. That's him on the left, if you were wondering, and is there even any debate? He wouldn't be sporting a perm or that smile as Bond, but he so looks ready to order his shaken-not-stirred vodka martini, while holding a gun with one hand and a beauty with the other.

I think the Bond films are due for a downturn anyway; the last few were huge hits, but the last two especially got very silly. Gone was any pretense of a plot or spy thriller, elements swept away to free up space for one improbable special effects sequence after another. I was actively bored and annoyed several times during Die Another Day, the last Bond film, and my review scores reflected that. Pity it'll be Craig who gets the blame for the declining box office, when it's going to be due to the absurd films rather than any star power, or lack thereof, on his part. Though you have to admit that casting an actual movie star wouldn't have hurt. I would mention acting ability, but the films have become so ludicrous that that talent is largely irrelevant.

Ugly actors aside, the British newspaper's announcement that Craig had the role doesn't look to be the last word anyway. Newer news says it's still up for grabs, and that they might even do another one or two with Brosnan himself.

 

 

¤ In happier news, there is a film opening this weekend that Malaya and me are interested in. Not the big studio mediocrities Sahara or Fever Pitch; no we wanna Kung Fu Hustle. It's a film by Steven Chow, who is basically a younger and funnier Jackie Chan; plus he can still do his own stunts. People who are into Hong Kong films hold him up like a comedy action god, and most of them say his previous film, Shaolin Soccer, was a total blast. I heard it was good, but I also heard that Miramax's editing ruined it in the American version, and I know they delayed the release about two years and killed its box office opportunities. So I've never rented the Miramax version, while never making any effort to hunt down a non-US version instead.

I am interested in Kung Fu Hustle though, especially since Chow found a new distributor for this one. I'm not sure if it'll be any good or not; the trailers have a lot of funny stuff, but I can't tell if it'll be hilarious or ridiculous. It is being well-reviewed though; 92% positive (33/36) on Rotten Tomatoes is a very good sign.

Unfortunately, it's only opening in NY/LA, though hopefully it'll go wider in two weeks and we can catch it then.

 

 

¤ Lastly, I've been following the progress of the Russian film Night Watch for some time. I first saw links to some very crappy footage streaming from a Russian website at least a year ago, and while the movie sounded very cool, and I knew it was a gigantic hit in Russia when it was released there last summer, I wondered if it was really any good. Could the creators, pull off the special special effects and Matrix style action stuff with their very limited budget? I've been keeping it in mind though, hoping that when it eventually turned up in the US it would be worth watching. I don't know about the movie yet, it's not coming out until July, but a US trailer is now online, and it's goddamned awesome.

Check out the trailer, if there aren't at least half a dozen things that make you go, "Cool!" then you're not on my wavelength as to what makes a supernatural action movie work. I'd put this one on top of my list for the best trailer of the year. So far, anyway.

Better yet, this is just the first film in a planned trilogy and they're making the other two with vastly-increased budgets, since this one has done so well financially.

<-- Previous  --  Next -->
Archives Index Page

 

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.