![]() |
|
Current Entertainment:
Books Lying
Open
Soul-Devouring Worry:
Question of the Day:
Curse of the Day:
Phrase
of the Moment: Over the months it's become ritualized to the point that any time we hear any loud, interrupting noise, at home or elsewhere, I can say, "Did you..." and she'll immediately reply, "Nope." -- January 14, 2004 |
Friday January 16, 2004 |
| Quote
of the Day -- QotD Archives
Television is obsessed with telling you what's coming up next, so much that you can hardly enjoy what's on now. -- Tom Snyder |
|
|
About the only thing of note lately is the continuing D2 resurgence around here. Malaya and I played a bit more on Tuesday, and then got in another couple of hours Thursday night. We've moved my Necro and her Sorc halfway through Act 3 and are still going well. No one has come anywhere near dying, despite Malaya playing with virtually no thought to resistance and about 50 stat points in reserve at lvl 23. My Necro is lvl 25 and is still going very cheap, with just one point in everything, and +2 to all from his wand and helm. I'm mostly saving up to put points into Lower Resistance and Bone Spirit at lvl 30, and counting on that and my minions and my sorcy partner for long term killing power. I do love nuking away any big mobs with corpse explosion, but the mana cost for that is hurting me with the very minimal +mana gear I now possess. Spell-casting with a no-twinks char is touch and go at my low level. I use up a lot of blue pots, but they drop in plenty, and after all, this is v1.10, I can just buy them in the stores if/when I need to. It just feels so cheesy and Diablo-esque to do so... I have no idea how far we'll take these chars, but we're having fun so far in our relatively short bursts of play time, so as long as we're having fun, it's a go.
Since I'm in the middle of working on some other stuff, so this will be somewhat shorter than usual today. Of course these are usually a lot longer than I planned on them being, so I guess that just evens things out. Here's some news, and below is a longer article about some recent news.
¤ So you get a divorce and your ex-wife still lives in the city, and your son is in her custody. However you let the kid use your house since he wants to keep going to the same high school, and he comes over in the morning and rides to school with a friend. Before you go out of town for a week you warn him not to have any parties and think all will be well. Until the day you're leaving to fly home, you find out that your house has burned to the ground, and once you get home you find out from neighbors that there has been a wild teenager party going on for the entire week, in your nice home that is now ashes. How did the fire start? The guy's son set them.
Why did the kid burn down his dad's house? It was all part of his criminal master plan.
This is basically the worst case scenario that runs through a parent's head when they're contemplating leaving their teenager home alone. And like all worst case scenarios, it actually happens, sometimes. The worst part? The kid gets no real punishment.
I like how dad was hoping his little white bread punk child would get his ass kicked and raped in Juvie for 2 years. It's refreshing to hear from a parent who can realistically view their offspring's actions, and not just overlook everything bad because it's their little bastard doing the bad things. And yeah, I'd think not letting the little shit on your property again would be a good idea. Pity dad (or the insurance company) can't get a lien on the kid's future salary until he's covered the $330k damage. True, that would take about 40 years at his future McDonald's salary, and no amount of money would make up for losing everything you own in such a cruel fashion, but it's the principle of the thing that would soothe dad's broken life. |
|
|
The more interesting news is about the event that they announced the winners at. There were comedians and musicians and all sorts of stuff, but the big news is that female comedian Margaret Cho did some pretty biting anti-Bush material, and had the most outrageous bits of it excerpted on conservative internet news sites like Drudge Report and Freeperville. I can't find a good complete transcript anywhere, so for now the best we can do is the partial one on Drudge.
I laughed at the golden calf reference, personally. The Dubya's own 10 commandments were pretty good also, if only she could have gone for the whole 10 of them. So how are the natives taking her comments? The American Political Journal site has a collection of the more amusing flames Margaret has received since her comments were quoted on conservative sites. And yes, they (the flames) are about as racist and sexist and unimaginative as you'd expect from the sort of person who would be offended by what she had to say. Here's a few of them, and you'll note that the profanity has been removed, after the first letter of the word.
Quite a persuasive argument they make, isn't it? I was amused and amazed to see how many insults were based on her race, even to the point of calling her "slant-eyed." What is this, World War II? Who the hell says "slant-eyed" anymore? I thought that insult went out decades ago. I mean it's like insulting a black person for having "nappy hair," it's just ridiculous. One guy did say something about "blindfold you with dental floss" and I had to chuckle at that one, having never heard it before. Of course Malaya laughed as well before saying that she'd heard it in the past. There's also the whole, "Go back where you came from." thing that just makes me shake my head. The woman's like a 4th generation American; is racism based on physical appearance still so prevalent in the US? *sigh* Malaya has heard that line a few times herself (she's Asian) and her reply is usually, "But I don't want to live in Detroit?" "Go back where you came from." always seems a singularly idiotic comment to me, but since it's a comment made by idiots, I guess that's appropriate enough. I'm not surprised by the fact that so many conservative redneck types are ignorant enough of current events to hate what Margaret Cho said, but I am surprised that so many of the flames would go for racist or sexist or fatist comments. It's childish. If your only retort to a scathing political attack is to call someone names, you have no right to open your mouth. It's like saying, "I'm too stupid to take you on factually, so therefore I will imitate an 8 year old." If your only rebuttal is to curse and ad hominem, you've already lost the argument and should just sit quietly and let your betters decide your fate. |
|
|
<--
Previous -- Next --> |
|
All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007. |