Navigation

 BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also welcome.

Site Information
 
What is Black Champagne?
 
Cast of Characters/Things
 Your First Time
 Design Notes
 Quote of the Day Archive
 Phrase of the Moment Archive
 Site Feedback
 Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
 • Blogger Archives: June 2005-present
 • Old Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
  • Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
  • The Protector -- 6
  • The Limey -- 8
  • The Descent -- 6
  • Oldboy -- 9.5
  • Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
  • Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
  • Chase Step by Step -- 7.5
  • V is for Vendetta -- 8.5
  • Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 6
  • Night Watch -- 7.5
Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
 • Cat People, by Michael Korda -- 4
 • Attack Poodles, by James Wolcott -- 5
 • Caught Stealing, by Charlie Huston -- 6
 • The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
 • Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos and Captions
 • Flux Photos
 • Pet Photos (7 pages)
 • Home Decor Photos
 • Plant Photos
 • Vacation Photos (21 pages)

Articles Section
See all 234 Articles

Fiction
Original fantasy and horror short stories.

Mail Bags
 Index Page

Features
 
Links
 Slang: Internet
 Slang: Dirty
 Slang: Wankisms
 Slang: Sex Acts
 Slang: Fulldeckisms
 Hot or Not?
 Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQFeedback
A • BC • D • E
FGHIJ • K
LMNOP
Q • RSTU
V • W • XY • Z

Diablo II
 • The Unofficial Site
 • Flux's Decahedron
 • Middle Earth Mod

Current Entertainment:
DVD ¤
Lord of the Rings:The Two Towers, Special Extended Edition
CD-ROM
¤ D2X
Music

¤
System of a Down - System of a Down
¤ Nine Inch Nails - Still
¤ Tool - Opiate
¤ Marilyn Manson - The Golden Age of Grotesque
¤ Anthrax - We've Come For You All

Books Lying Open
¤ A Storm of Swords, George R. R. Martin
¤ The Complete Tales and Poems, Edgar Allen Poe
¤
Wolves of the Calla, Steven King

Soul-Devouring Worry
¤
The dozen houses Malaya just stuck on those damned red properties just past Free Parking.

Life's Too Short For:
¤
Bothering with unimportant holidays.

Curse of the Day:
¤
May your new kitties turn their new toy into roadkill in less than three days.

Phrase of the Moment:
¤ Phrase: "We're so not ready"
¤ Usage: "We're so not ready."
¤
Synonyms: N/A
¤ Deviations: None.
¤
Origin: Someone said it, and it stuck.
¤
Notes: This catch phrase is uttered by Malaya or myself at least once a day, and more often than that when we're out in public. It refers to "ready to have children" and is mostly used when we see someone with a screaming baby, whining 5 year old, surly teenager, etc. Basically offspring of any age who come into your life, live in your house, interrupt your every free moment for 18 years, and are pretty much perpetually ungrateful for their existence on earth, an existence that you are entirely responsible for.

It can also be used for other future plans that one or the other of us don't really want to deal with, such as full time work, dog ownership, getting a home loan, and more. -- November 17, 2003

Friday November 28, 2003
Quote of the Day -- QotD Archives
Asking a writer what he thinks about criticism is like asking a lamppost what it feels about dogs.
--John Osborne
Daily Blog
To repeat something from yesterday, since no one responded to it: I'm looking to get a deep fryer, since Malaya and I do love them FFs.  We're looking for any reader feedback on using them, good/bad features, brand recommendations or curses, and so on.  If anyone has experience with such devices, please share.

 

So, it's Thanksgiving.  At least for another fifteen minutes or so (as of 11:45pm, when I'm writing this.  Well, it's Thanksgiving in the US, anyway; I'm not so sure about other countries and their versions of this sort of holiday. In the US the whole thing is just a modified harvest festival, dressed up with an almost entirely fictional "Peaceful Indians dine with Pilgrims" legend.  (Or you might prefer this sort of fairy tale of the T-day origins. It's a lot funnier, anyway, assuming you consider incredibly blatant lies humorous.)

They also have a Thanksgiving in Canada, but it's weeks earlier, probably since winter snows (and wolves) come earlier that much further north. And bears.  Always the bears.

Anyway, Malaya went over and spent some time with various relatives, where they ate nothing even faintly-resembling the classic turkey/stuffing/cranberry sauce/etc.  I stayed home and at almost nothing at all, subsisting upon Quaker natural cereal and a couple of fried eggs over toast. However once she got home in the evening we did have turkey burgers with French Fries.

I've never really celebrated T-day, for no particular reason.  Perhaps since I'm such a selfish and evil person that I don't think anyone but me deserves thanks?  I'm sure that's part of it, but there's also the fact that I'm very uneasy, sort of claustrophobic, in medium-sized gatherings of people in small spaces.  I'm fine with 4 or 5 or 8 in a house, or 50,000 in a stadium, if it's just for a few hours, but when I get up around 10 or 12 or more crammed into a small house, I get hella-itchy and need to go outside and walk around alone just to get some personal space.  Which is why I've always categorically turned down any invitations to go anywhere for a T-day meal, knowing the sort of crowding and human interaction such events inevitably require.

This year T-day was also the day before Malaya's B-day, and oddly enough, she never does much to celebrate that day either.  I'm not big on B-day celebrations myself, but I do like presents and perhaps going out to dinner with my parents.  It's mostly an excuse to spend time with people I care about and score some new loot, but now that I'm in love and all brainwashed and such, a B-day suddenly seems like a really great thing, since it's like a chance to celebrate the existence of the person I care more about than anyone else on earth. God damn but love is corrupting of my formerly pure values.

I hadn't planned anything all that clever for her B-day, mostly since that sort of thing never occurs to me in advance.  I'll do better next year.

I had been planning on taking her out and spending some time with her, but I hadn't checked the calendar to notice that her B-day was the day after Thanksgiving.  And as you probably know, the Friday after T-day is traditionally the busiest shopping day of the entire year in the US. Sort of puts a bullet in the head of my "we'll take a quiet stroll around the mall and I'll buy her something she desires" idea, eh?

 

In other holiday news, I wrote an epilogue to my five-part ongoing Diablo II humorous holiday tales, one set on Thanksgiving. I'd describe it in more detail but this is the last part of the blog I'm writing today and I'm very ready for bed.  So more on that tomorrow, along with comments on the reader feedback for the story, and all that happy shit.

used to read Lileks all the time.

I thought he was a good writer and was funny and I liked his humorous captions about hideous nostalgic crap. Yet over time I found him less and less amusing and more and more smarmy, and began to not read his blog daily, and began to be more and more insulted by his relentless shilling via weird over-personalizing of the neocon agenda (always some poor theoretical oppressed Iraqi, yearning for the US to come and set him free, while oddly enough, no Lileks-rendered Palestinian ever felt that way about Israel).  Eventually I had to give up on his blog entirely, since it just annoyed me, yet I still can't quite figure out why. He's funny, some of the time, and he's snarky and borderline heart-warming much of the time, but somehow, even if he's not writing about or I can overlook his politics, I just have this feeling of dread when I contemplate reading his blog, and haven't actually done so for at least 3 or 4 months.

Considering that I used to look forward to midnight so that I could go and read his new daily update, this is a strange state of affairs.  And it's hard for me to figure out why I no longer tolerate him and what went wrong.  Somehow, while I was looking, he just grew dreary.  Reading him feels like a chore now, and every couple of weeks when I've got a bored minute and I'm looking at my blogs bookmarks, I consider clicking over, but can't quite bring myself to do it.

Fortunately, I saw some discussion of him on another blog just a couple of days ago, and they had a link to lilekswatch.blogspot.com.  It takes approximately forever to load and it hasn't been updated in almost a year, but reading the comments there really did help he figure out just what it is about him that finally lost me as a reader.  I was annoyed by his ridiculously efforts to personalize the neocon agenda of Middle East domination, and his relentlessly apologistic nature when it came time to defend the latest idiocy from Bush, but there was something more about him that curdled even the most banal commentary.  And some of the posts on the lilekswatch site encapsulated it nicely.

Lileks can be very funny when he's talking about the quirks of domestic life or benign aspects of popular culture. In some ways he's like a modern day Thurber.

But as soon as he starts interjecting his political views into the mix, it becomes apparent how naive he really is. Embarrassingly naive.

Imagine being at a cocktail party listening to a delightful storyteller who has a fine command of the English language pass along anecdotes of his daily life, peppered with sparkling wit and good humor. In the middle of all this, the speaker slowly begins crapping his pants as if it were the most normal thing in the world, all the while continuing on with his tales.

The look that would appear on your face in that situation is similar to the one I get whenever Lileks strays away from pleasant trivialities like quaint postcards and old matchbook covers that he's collected. It's painfully obvious that he's sorely out of his element.

I'd say it's more like the man begins picking his nose, or flows smoothly from a hilarious story about collecting antiques to one about his great great grandfather buying slaves fresh off the boat in Baton Rouge with seemingly no appreciation (or tolerance) for why that story is going to offend many of the listeners.

Of course the irony of it all is that anything I criticize Lileks for is something I could easily be criticized for myself. In a general sense, at least. We're obviously very different in political views, life experience, location, etc. But ignoring the specific details; we both write long opinionated blogs about whatever strikes our fancy, focusing far too much on our own lives and the essentially-meaningless minutia of them, and we both think we're far more clever than everyone else.

If there's a major difference it's that I can actually admit this, without doing it in a snarky, "aren't I so much more clever that I can actually admit I think I'm more clever" sort of way.  And I'm much more in touch with my self-loathing and less in denial about the world than he is.  I of course think he's hopelessly naive and full of wishful thinking about the world and politics, and think I'm more firmly grounded in reality.  But getting back to what I said in the previous paragraph, I'm sure he'd say just the same thing about himself.

Whether that would prove my point, or prove that I'm just as self-delusional as he is remains open to debate.

 

While thinking about Lileks I kept trying to remember another site that I at one time loved, but that I eventually lost all interest in, perhaps to the point of even deleting the bookmark.  Andrew Sullivan is a good example; he's another blogger and a pretty famous one.  I like his writing, much of the time, and he's very good talking about gay issues (he's gay) or Catholic church issues (he's a Catholic) but most of the time he covers politics, and his relentlessly right wing point of view bores me terribly.

I often read right wing blogs or comments and sometimes even agree with them.  Or I disagree, but I can see that the person writing the comment really believes it and has something valid to base it on, other than his opinion of how the world should be.  Sullivan used to do that, or perhaps I was just fooling myself, but since 9/11, when the ever-increasingly-partizan Republican movement in America seized upon terrorism as their excuse for everything, he's just become unreadable. He spends nearly every update defending anything and everything that Bush has done or is considering doing, no matter how insane, but more than that it's his style of doing it that is so loathsome.

I'll correct that; it's not loathsome, it's lacking in integrity, which I find dishonest. Sullivan lives to make ridiculous arguments (like the one about how BushCo didn't imply in every way that Iraq was an imminent threat just because Bush never actually used the word "imminent") and he makes them in ridiculous ways.  He parses quotes and takes things out of context and just generally engages in every sort of intellectual and journalistic dishonesty in an effort to make his pre-determined point.

But that's not a good example of a site I've lost interest in, since it partially overlaps my reason for no longer reading Lileks.

 

Looking at my bookmarks now, I'll throw out a few other examples.

Overboard: This comic strip is in lots of newspapers and I loved it about 2 or 3 years go when it first started running in the San Diego paper.  They eventually canned it in SD early in 2003, and I missed it and hunted it up online, and kept reading it as one of the dozen or so comics I read online once I moved up north to live with Malaya, since we don't get the paper here.  Sadly, I've pretty much given up on it since about September or so, for a simple reason. It's never funny anymore.

Several years ago it was great, very dark and cruel in the humor and peopled with amusing characters. Unfortunately, it's since lost all of the edge it once had and has become a predictable, poorly-drawn, three panel sitcom with the same jokes repeated endlessly. The dog is probably the worst element of the strip now, with his one-note early-Garfield antics.  He either lies down on the watch dog job, steals food, or makes a mess in 95% of the strips he's featured in, and he gets into at least 2 or 3 a week.

This strip has so completely jumped the shark that I almost want to get a collection of early strips and read them again now, to see if it really used to be good, or if I was just fooling myself somehow.

 

CAP Alerts: I used to love this site for the comedic value of the uber-Christian PoV of the reviews, but as I look there now I realize I haven't visited it in months.  I'm not sure why; there wasn't any conscious decision to stop reading it, and I can still fondly remember some of the old reviews.  The South Park review is one of the funniest things I've ever read in my life, and is about the best promotion for it possible.  I can't see anyone reading that and not wanting to see the movie.  While not an amusing review (too much of the "tut tut" type commentary), I still think of the bullet-listed "cohabitation" and laugh every time I see any mention of The Bourne Identity.

But for whatever reason, I never seem to check that site anymore.  I'm taking a look now, and whaddya know, I'm getting a bit of that old magic back.  His Haunted Mansion review is pretty good, and I laughed out loud at a few remarks.  All humor in the CAP reviews is entirely unintentional on the part of the author, of course:

Though clearly fantasy, the film is filled with necromancy and divination -- communicating with the dead and seeking their guidance instead of the Lord's. Saul, son of Kish, paid dearly for that [1 Samuel 28:3-20]. And if you find communicating with the dead as innocuous or as a fine jest, seek for yourself what God has to say about it. Try a search on any good search engine for (+"communicate with the dead" +Bible) using all characters between but not including the parentheses.

Do you believe in ghosts? That is a question Ramsley asks of Jim a number of times and by Ramsley asking that question in the movie it will be asked in the minds of your kids if they watch Haunted Mansion. And the question that is formed in their mind may not be asked of you by them. Did your kids ask you if ghosts were real when they heard the cowardly Lion of The Wizard of Oz repeatedly say "I DO relieve in spooks, I do, I do, I do" while trembling in fear? Well? Do you believe in ghosts? I do. One ghost anyway. The Holy Ghost. Yes, spirits do exist in the ethereal and unholy realms. But if we have been covered by the Blood of the Lamb, we have nothing to worry about. Can unholy ghosts become a physical manifestation? I have no idea and have witnessed no evidence of it.

I suppose that for me, the novelty of this guy's worldview has worn off.  After you read a couple of dozen reviews they all begin to sound the same, and it takes an especially outrageous comment to break through my boredom to reach my funnybone.  Here's a typically wandering excerpt from his Brother Bear review that had me yawning until the end, when I cracked up.

Comments such as Don't upset the spirits" and "The great spirits have revealed to me..." pepper the script. Such is a most difficult dilemma to consider: that spirits have an influence over our lives. Indeed, each child has a guardian angel which beholds the very face of God [Matt. 18:10]. Could not the spirits of the ancient beliefs not have been their concept of the angels which watch over us? The contradiction comes as the beliefs expressed in this movie have animal spirits watching over us. Take great care, mom/dad if you decide to expose your children to this concept that dangerously borders on, if not is, worship of the planet and life on it (Gaiaism?) instead of worship of the Creator of the planet and all life on it [John 14:6]. Granted, this sort of belief was (and, to some, is) a system of faith and doctrine but that a population or culture adopts a system of faith does not make it acceptable to God [Col. 2:8].

Disney was nearly as magnificent in their animation and artistry as in other Disney works of art. Their portrayal of the elderly as wise and respected was delightful, conjuring hope in myself to be treated with the respect due wisdom that comes only with age when I become old.

God he is such a douche bag. So pompous, like if someone doesn't respect him when he's old it's entirely their fault for being a bad person, and in no way might reflect upon the fact that Mr. CAP Alerts was an idiot when he was young, and nothing has changed now that he's old.

Some of his writing depresses me as well, I suppose since I'm always bothered by a person who is so willfully ignorant.  I can't watch those Jackass type shows, where some stupid kids set themselves on fire or fall down stairs since it's depressing.  This guy is basically engaging in a life long Jackassian act of self destruction, but with philosophy and belief, rather than physical pratfalls.

 

I'm trying to only mention ones that I've stopped viewing for site-related reasons, rather than changes in my personal tastes. I never look at any gaming sites anymore, other than the one I work on, since I'm not spending any time gaming or following upcoming games any longer. So while it's true that I haven't visited gamespot or gamespy or others in months and months, it's not due to them sucking (any harder than they used to).

And on a related topic, I view Penny Arcade about once a week now, and just skim over the news updates while viewing the comics.  And it's not that they suck now, it's that I don't care about the console gaming they mostly talk about. If not for the frequently-funny cartoons, I wouldn't visit just for the blog-style updates, even though Tycho does write pretty well at times, when he's not obviously trying so hard to be clever with a simile or metaphor that you can almost see his keyboard bleeding.

I may continue this topic some time in the future, if the urge strikes me, since it leads me to self-analysis, and I enjoy that.

Any of you guys/girls have a site you used to love, but no longer visit very much/at all, and want to tell me why not?  (And yes, this opens the door to snide remarks about how you never read this site anymore.  Go for it, if it'll make you happy.)

<-- Previous  --  Next -->
Archives Index Page

 

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.