Navigation

 • BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also welcome.

Site Information
 
• What is Black Champagne?
 
• Cast of Characters/Things
 • Your First Time
 • Design Notes
 • Quote of the Day Archive
 • Phrase of the Moment Archive
 • Site Feedback
 • Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
 • Blogger Archives: June 2005-present
 • Old Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
  • Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
  • The Protector -- 6
  • The Limey -- 8
  • The Descent -- 6
  • Oldboy -- 9.5
  • Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
  • Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
  • Chase Step by Step -- 7.5
  • V is for Vendetta -- 8.5
  • Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 6
  • Night Watch -- 7.5
Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
 • Cat People, by Michael Korda -- 4
 • Attack Poodles, by James Wolcott -- 5
 • Caught Stealing, by Charlie Huston -- 6
 • The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
 • Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos and Captions
 • Flux Photos
 • Pet Photos (7 pages)
 • Home Decor Photos
 • Plant Photos
 • Vacation Photos (21 pages)

Articles Section
See all 234 Articles

Fiction
Original fantasy and horror short stories.

Mail Bags
 • Index Page

Features
 
• Links
 • Slang: Internet
 • Slang: Dirty
 • Slang: Wankisms
 • Slang: Sex Acts
 • Slang: Fulldeckisms
 • Hot or Not?
 • Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ • Feedback
A • B • C • D • E
F • G • H • I • J • K
L • M • N • O • P
Q • R • S • T • U
V • W • X • Y • Z

Diablo II
 • The Unofficial Site
 • Flux's Decahedron
 • Middle Earth Mod

Current Entertainment:
DVD
Silence of the Lambs
CD-ROM
None
Music

System of a Down - System of a Down
Nine Inch Nails - Still
Tool - Opiate
Marilyn Manson - The Golden Age of Grotesque
Anthrax - We've Come For You All

Books Lying Open
A Storm of Swords, George R. R. Martin
The Complete Tales and Poems, Edgar Allen Poe
The Complete Far Side, 1990-1994, Gary Larson
Wolves of the Calla, Steven King

Soul-Devouring Worry
Unsweetened Japanese cookies.

Life's Too Short For:
Only reading a good book during the pre-approved book reading times.

Curse of the Day:
May you fail to take your new lack of hair into account when dispensing shampoo into your hands.

Phrase of the Moment:
Phrase: "I sure hope nothing bad happens to him."
Usage: "Honey, I sure do like that Gollum guy a lot.  I hope nothing bad happens to him."
Synonyms: N/A
Origin: I made this one up some weeks ago, after reading in Entertainment Weekly that the main female prosecutor character on Law and Order:SUV was going to be leaving the show and showing Malaya the article. That night when we were watching a rerun of it I started talking about how much I liked her character and how I hoped she'd be on the show forever.
Notes: This catch phrase is uttered by me several times a week, and is almost sure to crack up Malaya and myself.  It's best delivered in an innocent and hopeful voice, when she and I both know for sure that something bad is going to happen to him, whoever him (or her) may be.  The humor comes from the earnestness with which I say it, and the cluelessness implied by not realizing how very wrong I am.

It can also be used to tease, if I know something and she doesn't, since once I say it she's consumed with worry for the future well-being of the character.  Like for instance since I know how LotR turns out, and she doesn't, and I said it about oh... Frodo.  Or Aragorn. -- December 6, 2003

Thursday December 11, 2003
Quote of the Day -- QotD Archives
It has always seemed strange to me that in our endless discussions about education so little stress is laid on the pleasure of becoming an educated person, the enormous interest it adds to life. To be able to be caught up into the world of thought -- that is to be educated.
--Edith Hamilton
ednesday's activities included doing laundry (uneventful), shopping for clothing and jewelry for Malaya (boring and headachy for me), and getting a haircut (my worst one ever).  I'll talk some more about the haircut tomorrow, since there's some funny blog stuff in it, but I just don't have the energy to get into it tonight.

What I do have the energy to do is post a couple of news items (well, one, plus a booby photo) and then a collection of recent reader emails, with my comments added in, and the usual way off topic digressions.  Enjoy.

 


Back in early May, I posted various news items and reader comments about circumcision several days in a row, as the topic sort of took on a life of its own.  Check the blogs on May 1st, 2nd, and 3rd if you want to read more. I don't want to start that up again, but there's an interesting article from Norway about a man suing a hospital over being circumcised unexpectedly.

A man who woke up in a Molde hospital and found himself the recipient of an unexpected circumcision has been awarded NOK 20,000 (USD 3,000) in compensation from the surgeon, newspaper Sunnmψrsposten reports.

The patient told the court that he would never have embarked on surgery to relieve an uncomfortably tight foreskin if he had known a circumcision would result. The man claimed that the circumcision had destroyed his sex life by reducing the sensitivity of his penis and because he was now embarrassed to appear naked in front of his wife. He said he was also embarrassed to be naked in public bathing facilities now.

The surgeon said in his defense that at least 60 percent of American men are circumcised and that the procedure is routine for Jewish and Muslim babies. He also argued that the man was objectively better after the operation and he had been warned that the foreskin could be partially or completely removed.

The appeals court chose to believe that the resulting circumcision came as a shock to the patient, and ruled he had suffered damage, though not 'considerable' damage. The court also ruled that circumcision remains unusual in Norway and that the physical changes to the man's organ were self-evident.

It's an example of how different otherwise similar cultures can be. A guy who isn't circumcised in America is considered unusual and his weird-looking elephant trunk penis would turn off a lot of women, as the quotes I posted from females (back in May) testified.  Yet here's a guy who finally has that unsightly foreskin removed, and he's practically impotent because of it.

And not only that, but the Norwegian courts pretty much said that unexpectedly waking up with an American penis is cause for a cash reward.  I don't know about the rest of your Americans, but I'm feeling a bit insulted by all of this.

 

 

This is not in any way newsworthy, but here's a new photo of Britney from Korea, showing off her amazing size-changing boobies. Looks like she got herself deflated recently, eh?

U.S. pop singer Britney Spears performs at Seoul Broadcasting System Hall in Seoul, South Korea Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2003. Spears was in Seoul as part of her Asia tour for the promotion of her new album 'In the Zone.' (AP Photo/BMG Korea, HO)

ere are some recent reader mails on leather jackets and The Last Samurai, comments on Pirates of the Caribbean, another email about that weird CAP Alerts guy, and some more comments on his hypocritical ass.

First off here's Jeremy, author of his own fine website, who had a comment about jacket shoplifting.

First off, I'd like to say that this chained up leathers really got me thinking, we have exactly the same situation here in England, with your top end Armani jacket being almost totally unsecured and even your tackiest leather jacket being veritably enmeshed in plastic covered chains. I actually think I have the answer for this one and I think you'll agree it makes sense.

Picture if you will, the kind of guy who finds a top designer sports jacket desirable.
Now, picture the kind of guy who thinks a leather jacket is cool. Finally, ask yourself which of these two guys is most likely to have the wherewithal to actually pay for the desired item?

Now I know this amounts to little more than neo-fascist stereotyping, but hey, this is corporate retailer logic we're dealing with here. You can kick me if I'm wrong.

 

There were two comments from readers who had seen The Last Samurai. Both of them liked it:

O.k., so you've got some valid points but let's just get over our little uber-cynical thing you've got going on. It did have rather good fighting scenes, which I thought enhanced the movie quite a bit, and it also had a rather good story. You said you were turned off by the cliche story hence Dances with Samurai. And while that has some validity, I thought that it worked quite well. Anyways, I doubt this does much to warm you to it, esp. since you are such a cynical bastard, but I for one thought that it was excellent, even with all of Cruise's problems. (He played a mostly drunk, nightmare plagued, and hardened West vet. pretty well)

--Greg

And a longer review from Jacob, from which I've removed most of the plot summary, since it would be spoilery for those of you who haven't already read a dozen reviews of the movie, like I have.

A group of friends and myself went to see The Last Samurai opening night. We were not expecting it to be as good as it was. I too, from the previews, was expecting something as to what you wrote that you were expecting. However, I was not prepared for what I saw. It is truly epic. I usually do not like Tom Cruise, but he worked in this role. It did not seem to me to be a typical “white man goes out to educate savages and learns from them” film, as we quickly find out that the Samurai way of life is presented in a far more civilized and honorable way than the Western culture. 

[snip]

I know that, on the surface the film does not sound like much, but the film is difficult to explain, as much of the film is calm and subtle in its storytelling, developing Cruise’s character as a captive as he comes to understand the new culture he finds himself in. There is also a small love story, which is vastly underplayed, thankfully, and thus hits on just the right note.

In the end, I found this film on a scale of Braveheart or Gladiator, but with less violence and blood, and more story and character development. Everyone I went to the film with also immensely enjoyed it as well.

[sip]

That all being said, this may not be a movie for everyone, but it is definitely worth seeing sometime, if not in theatre, on video or DVD.

Thanks for reading,

Jacob

Despite these recommendations, and the generally positive reviews it's gotten online, neither Malaya or I are interested in seeing it, so I doubt you'll be seeing a review of it here anytime soon.

 

Something you may see a review of here at some point is Pirates of the Caribbean.  I saw it when it was in the theaters this summer, and talked about it below the Terminator 3 discussion on July 23rd, if you're curious. Basically, I was amused, but only just, and my main complaint was how fairy tale and jokey the whole thing was.  I never felt any real excitement or danger or suspense since I never had any doubt the good guys would be okay and the bad guys would never really do anything mean, despite all of their bluster.

We bought the DVD last week ($14.99 at Target) mostly to get it while it was affordable, but we've not gotten around to watching it yet, and don't seem to feel any urgency to do so. I remember it with some fondness, and I'm curious to see if it keeps the "feel good" elements while losing some of the "and here's yet another non-violent ship battle where Capt. Jack Sparrow switches sides when it proves convenient" that bored me the first time.

Last week's Entertainment Weekly reviewed the DVD and summed up my feelings about the basic problems of the movie more succinctly than I've yet been able to do:

The rollicking but exhausting pirates is about a half hour too log (with at least one too many numbing Bruckhimerian set pieces) but thankfully, at home you can pause the bombast to get your sea legs and take an aspirin.

When we watch it I'll blog something or other about it, and I'm sure you're all just holding your breath for that glorious day.

To tide you over, I suggest that crazy CAP Alerts guy's review, which while not his finest work, does have some funny stuff in the bullet points of evil section:

Impudence/Hate (I)
  • four uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary (though used literally in accordance with proper definitions, they were used more as an excuse to add them)
  • adolescent deceit
  • buying favor
  • lie to protect identity
  • bird defecation on shoulder

Ahh yes, "adolescent deceit." It's truly a sin before the eyes of Baby Jesus when a movie doesn't get an "R" rating with that sort of foulness in it.  Not to mention a joke about a parrot shitting on someone's shoulder.  That's certainly enough to turn a child to heroin abuse then and there.

 

And speaking of that crazy CAP Alerts guy, here's most of a mail from Donnie about him.

Anyway, I was reading your blog yesterday and saw the link where you said that the CAP Alert guy was not going to review "Bad Santa", so I clicked the link to take a look and see if it mentioned why. It mentions why only in very vague terms, not playing close enough, not enough time, not enough donations, not enough whatever.. As it is never specified which could be the cause of it, I figure the guy just decided that the parents would be smart enough to figure out that a movie called "Bad Santa" would not be a good children's movie ('cause seriously, in his eyes, there is never even a Santa. At birth the baby Jesus only got gold and frankensomething.).

When I did link through to the CAP Alert site, though, I did see a review that I wanted to look at. That was his review of "The Matrix: Revolutions". I read through that entire review, and then looked at their "W.I.S.D.O.M." meter to see how it shook down. I was actually amazed at how well it scored, yet at the same time, a bit disappointed at how they (he) tried to make it sound like a direct rip-off of the bible. "Good vs. Evil" , yes and so it has been since the beginning of time but, Neo is Jesus? The Architect is Satan? The Oracle is God? Mr. Smith is the Anti-Christ? I mean, come on man, it is all fictional (like the bible and baby Jesus for that matter.), so what is the problem?

Once I had enough of that crap, I saw that they had their review of the "G" rated movie "Brother Bear" there as well. I figured I would take a look at a movie that he would think would be okay for children.

He (they) did not rip this one apart nearly as much as the others, but still people take their children to see this movie to entertain them for an hour or two (the story is good, the animation is good, it is very wholesome). The CAP Alert guy is saying that they use the phrase "The Spirits" to often. Like "The Spirits tell me that I need to do it." The movie loses points for that in the Cap Alert guys eyes.

This is a CARTOON, and trying to teach children about sharing, caring, loving, respect for elders and more. This cartoon is doing it without ever killing anyone, except there is a 'suicide' to save the son late in the movie.

When I think back over all the books I have ever read, and I try to think of which one had the most murder, death, debauchery and sin, the one book that comes to mind is the BIBLE.

Thank the random fluctuations of time and space that I don't have any children. If I ever had children they would not be allowed to read that crap.

As I replied to Donnie, I assume the CAP Alerts guy has a FAQ somewhere that explains why it's bad for a movie to have violence, depictions of war, slavery, adultery, murder, sex, etc, when the Bible is simply full of that sort of thing, and Mr. CAP Alerts is supposedly living his life based on that Bible. I guess he'd say that his site is just there to inform, and to give parents a guide to movies, but you'll note how he often (usually) condemns an entire movie if there's more than just a little bit of violence or foulness in it.

So that rule doesn't apply to the Bible because...?

And I'm sure he recommends parents not allow their children to read the Bible, since it's full of the sorts of things he says they should avoid in movies.  Right?  Or does he have a site page with a review of the Bible, and perhaps notes on which sections are the most sexual or violent, so that parents can avoid reading those aloud to their children?

It's also interesting that while his conception of God apparently couldn't relate the tales in the Bible without using violence and other bad stuff to make His point, modern movie directors are expected to do so, and damned when they don't.

And yes, picking out hypocrisies in the behavior and attitudes of the faithful is rather like shooting fish in a kitchen sink, but like ventilating the aforementioned ichthyos in the sink, it's still sorta fun.

<-- Previous  --  Next -->
Archives Index Page

 

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.