|
Current Entertainment:
DVD
€ Silence of the Lambs
CD-ROM
€ None
Music
€
System
of a Down
- System of a Down
€ Nine
Inch Nails
- Still
€ Tool
- Opiate
€ Marilyn
Manson
- The Golden Age of Grotesque
€ Anthrax
- We've Come For You All
Books Lying
Open
€ A Storm of Swords, George R. R. Martin
€ The Complete Tales and
Poems, Edgar Allen Poe
€ The
Complete Far Side, 1990-1994, Gary Larson
€
Wolves of the Calla,
Steven King
Soul-Devouring
Worry
€ Unsweetened Japanese cookies.
Life's
Too Short For:
€ Only reading a good book during the pre-approved book
reading times.
Curse of the Day:
€ May you fail to take your new lack of hair into
account when dispensing shampoo into your hands.
Phrase
of the Moment:
€
Phrase: "I sure hope nothing bad happens to him."
€ Usage: "Honey, I
sure do like that Gollum guy a lot. I hope nothing bad happens to
him."
€ Synonyms: N/A
€ Origin: I made this one up some weeks ago,
after reading in Entertainment Weekly that the main female prosecutor
character on Law and Order:SUV was going to be leaving the show and
showing Malaya the article. That night when we were watching a rerun of
it I started talking about how much I liked her character and how I
hoped she'd be on the show forever.
€ Notes: This catch phrase is uttered by me
several times a week, and is almost sure to crack up Malaya and
myself. It's best delivered in an innocent and hopeful voice, when
she and I both know for sure that something bad is going to
happen to him, whoever him (or her) may be. The humor comes from
the earnestness with which I say it, and the cluelessness implied by not
realizing how very wrong I am. It can
also be used to tease, if I know something and she doesn't, since once I
say it she's consumed with worry for the future well-being of the
character. Like for instance since I know how LotR turns out, and
she doesn't, and I said it about oh... Frodo. Or Aragorn. --
December 6, 2003 |
Thursday
December 11, 2003
|
ednesday's
activities included doing laundry (uneventful), shopping for clothing
and jewelry for Malaya (boring and headachy for me), and getting a
haircut (my worst one ever). I'll talk some more about the haircut
tomorrow, since there's some funny blog stuff in it, but I just don't
have the energy to get into it tonight.
What I do have the
energy to do is post a couple of news items (well, one, plus a booby
photo) and then a collection of recent reader emails, with my comments
added in, and the usual way off topic digressions. Enjoy.
€
Back in early
May, I posted various news items and reader comments about
circumcision several days in a row, as the topic sort of took on a life
of its own. Check the blogs on May
1st, 2nd,
and 3rd
if you want to read more. I don't want to start that up again, but
there's an
interesting article from Norway about a man suing a hospital over
being circumcised unexpectedly.
A man who woke up in a Molde hospital and found himself the recipient of
an unexpected circumcision has been awarded NOK 20,000 (USD 3,000) in
compensation from the surgeon, newspaper Sunnmψrsposten reports.
The patient told the court that he would never have embarked on surgery
to relieve an uncomfortably tight foreskin if he had known a
circumcision would result. The man claimed that the circumcision had
destroyed his sex life by reducing the sensitivity of his penis and
because he was now embarrassed to appear naked in front of his wife. He
said he was also embarrassed to be naked in public bathing facilities
now.
The surgeon said in his defense that at least 60 percent of American men
are circumcised and that the procedure is routine for Jewish and Muslim
babies. He also argued that the man was objectively better after the
operation and he had been warned that the foreskin could be partially or
completely removed.
The appeals court chose to believe that the resulting circumcision came
as a shock to the patient, and ruled he had suffered damage, though not
'considerable' damage. The court also ruled that circumcision remains
unusual in Norway and that the physical changes to the man's organ were
self-evident.
It's an example of how different otherwise similar cultures can be. A
guy who isn't circumcised in America is considered unusual and his
weird-looking elephant trunk penis would turn off a lot of women, as the
quotes I posted from females (back in May) testified. Yet here's a
guy who finally has that unsightly foreskin removed, and he's
practically impotent because of it.
And not only that, but the Norwegian courts pretty much said that
unexpectedly waking up with an American penis is cause for a cash
reward. I don't know about the rest of your Americans, but I'm
feeling a bit insulted by all of this.
€
This is not in any way newsworthy, but here's a new photo of Britney
from Korea, showing off her amazing size-changing
boobies. Looks like she got herself deflated recently, eh?
U.S. pop singer
Britney Spears performs at Seoul Broadcasting System Hall in Seoul,
South Korea Tuesday, Dec. 9, 2003. Spears was in Seoul as part of her
Asia tour for the promotion of her new album 'In the Zone.' (AP
Photo/BMG Korea, HO)
|
ere
are some recent reader mails on leather jackets and The Last Samurai,
comments on Pirates of the Caribbean, another email about that weird CAP
Alerts guy, and some more comments on his hypocritical ass.
First off here's Jeremy, author of his
own fine website, who had a comment about jacket shoplifting.
First off, I'd like to say that this chained up leathers really got me thinking, we have exactly the same situation here in England, with your top end Armani jacket being almost totally unsecured and even your tackiest leather jacket being veritably enmeshed in plastic covered chains. I actually think I have the answer for this one and I think you'll agree it makes sense.
Picture if you will, the kind of guy who finds a top designer sports jacket desirable.
Now, picture the kind of guy who thinks a leather jacket is cool. Finally, ask yourself which of these two guys is most likely to have the wherewithal to actually pay for the desired item?
Now I know this amounts to little more than neo-fascist stereotyping, but hey, this is corporate retailer logic we're dealing with here.
You can kick me if I'm wrong.
There were two comments from readers who had seen The Last Samurai.
Both of them liked it:
O.k., so you've got some valid points but let's just get over our little uber-cynical thing you've got going on. It did have rather good fighting scenes, which I thought enhanced the movie quite a bit, and it also had a rather good story. You said you were turned off by the cliche story hence
Dances with Samurai. And while that has some validity, I thought that it worked quite well. Anyways, I doubt this does much to warm you to it, esp. since you are such a cynical bastard, but I for one thought that it was excellent, even with all of Cruise's problems. (He played a mostly drunk, nightmare plagued, and hardened West vet. pretty well)
--Greg
And a longer review from Jacob, from which I've removed most of the
plot summary, since it would be spoilery for those of you who haven't
already read a dozen reviews of the movie, like I have.
A group of friends and myself went to see The Last Samurai opening night. We were not expecting it to be as good as it was. I too, from the previews, was expecting something as to what you wrote that you were expecting. However, I was not prepared for what I saw. It is truly epic. I usually do not like Tom Cruise, but he worked in this role. It did not seem to me to be a typical white man goes out to educate savages and learns from them film, as we quickly find out that the Samurai way of life is presented in a far more civilized and honorable way than the Western culture.
[snip]
I know that, on the surface the film does not sound like much, but the film is difficult to explain, as much of the film is calm and subtle in its storytelling, developing Cruises character as a captive as he comes to understand the new culture he finds himself in. There is also a small love story, which is vastly underplayed, thankfully, and thus hits on just the right note.
In the end, I found this film on a scale of Braveheart or Gladiator, but with less violence and blood, and more story and character development. Everyone I went to the film with also immensely enjoyed it as well.
[sip]
That all being said, this may not be a movie for everyone, but it is definitely worth seeing sometime, if not in theatre, on video or DVD.
Thanks for reading,
Jacob
Despite these recommendations, and the generally positive reviews
it's gotten online, neither Malaya or I are interested in seeing it, so
I doubt you'll be seeing a review of it here anytime soon.
Something you may see a review of here at some point is Pirates of
the Caribbean. I saw it when it was in the theaters this summer,
and talked about it below the Terminator 3 discussion on
July 23rd, if you're curious. Basically, I was amused, but only
just, and my main complaint was how fairy tale and jokey the whole thing
was. I never felt any real excitement or danger or suspense since
I never had any doubt the good guys would be okay and the bad guys would
never really do anything mean, despite all of their bluster.
We bought the DVD last week ($14.99 at Target) mostly to get it while
it was affordable, but we've not gotten around to watching it yet, and
don't seem to feel any urgency to do so. I remember it with some
fondness, and I'm curious to see if it keeps the "feel good"
elements while losing some of the "and here's yet another
non-violent ship battle where Capt. Jack Sparrow switches sides when it
proves convenient" that bored me the first time.
Last week's Entertainment Weekly reviewed the DVD and summed up my
feelings about the basic problems of the movie more succinctly than I've
yet been able to do:
The rollicking but exhausting pirates is about a half hour too log (with
at least one too many numbing Bruckhimerian set pieces) but thankfully,
at home you can pause the bombast to get your sea legs and take an
aspirin.
When we watch it I'll blog something or other about it, and I'm sure
you're all just holding your breath for that glorious day.
To tide you over, I suggest that crazy CAP
Alerts guy's review, which while not his finest work, does have some
funny stuff in the bullet points of evil section:
Impudence/Hate (I)
-
four uses of the three/four letter word vocabulary (though used
literally in accordance with proper definitions, they were used more as
an excuse to add them)
-
adolescent deceit
-
buying favor
-
lie to protect identity
-
bird defecation on shoulder
Ahh yes, "adolescent deceit." It's truly a sin before the
eyes of Baby Jesus when a movie doesn't get an "R" rating with
that sort of foulness in it. Not to mention a joke about a parrot
shitting on someone's shoulder. That's certainly enough to turn a
child to heroin abuse then and there.
And speaking of that crazy CAP Alerts guy, here's most of a mail from
Donnie about him.
Anyway, I was reading your blog yesterday and saw the link where you said that the CAP Alert guy was not going to review "Bad Santa", so I clicked the link to take a look and see if it mentioned why. It mentions why only in very vague terms, not playing close enough, not enough time, not enough donations, not enough whatever.. As it is never specified which could be the cause of it, I figure the guy just decided that the parents would be smart enough to figure out that a movie called "Bad Santa" would not be a good children's movie ('cause seriously, in his eyes, there is never even a Santa. At birth the baby Jesus only got gold and frankensomething.).
When I did link through to the CAP Alert site, though, I did see a review that I wanted to look at. That was his review of "The Matrix: Revolutions". I read through that entire review, and then looked at their "W.I.S.D.O.M." meter to see how it shook down. I was actually amazed at how well it scored, yet at the same time, a bit disappointed at how
they (he) tried to make it sound like a direct rip-off of the bible. "Good vs. Evil" , yes and so it has been since the beginning of time but, Neo is Jesus? The Architect is Satan? The Oracle is God? Mr. Smith is the Anti-Christ? I mean, come on man, it is all fictional (like the bible and baby Jesus for that matter.), so what is the problem?
Once I had enough of that crap, I saw that they had their review of the "G" rated movie "Brother Bear" there as well. I figured I would take a look at a movie that he would think would be okay for children.
He (they) did not rip this one apart nearly as much as the others, but still people take their children to see this movie to entertain them for an hour or two (the story is good, the animation is good, it is very wholesome). The CAP Alert guy is saying that they use the phrase "The Spirits" to often. Like "The Spirits tell me that I need to do it." The movie loses points for that in the Cap Alert guys eyes.
This is a CARTOON, and trying to teach children about sharing, caring, loving, respect for elders and more. This cartoon is doing it without ever killing anyone, except there is a 'suicide' to save the son late in the movie.
When I think back over all the books I have ever read, and I try to think of which one had the most murder, death, debauchery and sin, the one book that comes to mind is the BIBLE.
Thank the random fluctuations of time and space that I don't have any children. If I ever had children they would not be allowed to read that crap.
As I replied to Donnie, I assume the CAP Alerts guy has a FAQ
somewhere that explains why it's bad for a movie to have violence,
depictions of war, slavery, adultery, murder, sex, etc, when the Bible
is simply full of that sort of thing, and Mr. CAP Alerts is supposedly
living his life based on that Bible. I guess he'd say that his site is
just there to inform, and to give parents a guide to movies, but you'll
note how he often (usually) condemns an entire movie if there's more
than just a little bit of violence or foulness in it.
So that rule doesn't apply to the Bible because...?
And I'm sure he recommends parents not allow their children to read
the Bible, since it's full of the sorts of things he says they should
avoid in movies. Right? Or does he have a site page with a
review of the Bible, and perhaps notes on which sections are the most
sexual or violent, so that parents can avoid reading those aloud to
their children?
It's also interesting that while his conception of God apparently
couldn't relate the tales in the Bible without using violence and other
bad stuff to make His point, modern movie directors are expected to do
so, and damned when they don't.
And yes, picking out hypocrisies in the behavior and attitudes of the
faithful is rather like shooting fish in a kitchen sink, but like
ventilating the aforementioned ichthyos in the sink, it's still sorta
fun.
|