Navigation

 • BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also welcome.

Site Information
 
• What is Black Champagne?
 
• Cast of Characters/Things
 • Your First Time
 • Design Notes
 • Quote of the Day Archive
 • Phrase of the Moment Archive
 • Site Feedback
 • Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
 • Blogger Archives: June 2005-present
 • Old Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
  • Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
  • The Protector -- 6
  • The Limey -- 8
  • The Descent -- 6
  • Oldboy -- 9.5
  • Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
  • Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
  • Chase Step by Step -- 7.5
  • V is for Vendetta -- 8.5
  • Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 6
  • Night Watch -- 7.5
Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
 • Cat People, by Michael Korda -- 4
 • Attack Poodles, by James Wolcott -- 5
 • Caught Stealing, by Charlie Huston -- 6
 • The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
 • Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos and Captions
 • Flux Photos
 • Pet Photos (7 pages)
 • Home Decor Photos
 • Plant Photos
 • Vacation Photos (21 pages)

Articles Section
See all 234 Articles

Fiction
Original fantasy and horror short stories.

Mail Bags
 • Index Page

Features
 
• Links
 • Slang: Internet
 • Slang: Dirty
 • Slang: Wankisms
 • Slang: Sex Acts
 • Slang: Fulldeckisms
 • Hot or Not?
 • Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ • Feedback
A • B • C • D • E
F • G • H • I • J • K
L • M • N • O • P
Q • R • S • T • U
V • W • X • Y • Z

Diablo II
 • The Unofficial Site
 • Flux's Decahedron
 • Middle Earth Mod

Disks in Rotation:
DVD • Pulp Fiction
CD-ROM • D2X
CD Carousel
• Guns 'n Roses - Appetite for Destruction
• Metallica - S&M
• Jane's Addiction - Ritual de lo Habitual
• Metallica - Justice for All

Books Lying Open
• Grimm's Fairy Tales, The Brothers Grim

Soul-Devouring Worry
•
The years of denial will catch up with me someday.  No, no, on second thought that will never happen.

When I Grow Up:
•
"Monosyllabic" will be.

Curse of the Day:
•
May your knees hurt. But only when they bend.

Monday July 15, 2002
Quote of the Day
I am deeply troubled about asserting these rights, because it may be perceived by some that I have something to hide. -- Ken Lay, on taking the fifth about his roll in the Enron scandal

Daily Blog
I had the almost-overpowering urge yesterday evening to shut down email, ICQ, browser, and all other distracting software, and just write.  Work on the damn fantasy novel I have almost all plotted out in my head, do a new short story, something.  Fortunately I was able to resist it and just dick around with browsing and playing some D2 and dozing off in my chair.

I want to see a movie sometime.  I've been meaning to see Minority Report since it got good enough reviews that I could overlook Tom Cruise's participation, but haven't been bothered to do so yet.  My dad wanted to see it with me, but since he had his back surgery a few weeks ago, he still can't sit down in most chairs for that long.  Has to get up and shift around or stretch or pick a chair with less lower back support.  And being as movies pretty much invariably involve quite a while sitting, he's not wanted to go yet.

Besides the horribly-named Minority Report (it just invariably brings to mind some sort of uncomfortable-to-watch, humorless, depressing, racial tension-filled drama), Reign of Fire opened this weekend, and though I'm sure I'll find it utterly stupid and suck, I want to see the k3wl dragoonz flying around and cooking people.  A friend of mine saw it and thought it was okay, but said she'd be fine not seeing it again or buying the DVD.  Which is a mixed review at best. Critical mass on it is quite mixed also, with most reviewers not liking it, but overall it's doing better on reviews than most dumb action movies.  Better than MiB2, for comparison's sake.  Plus the veins of Reign of Fire doesn't flow with cutesy/campy pastel-colored blood, as every review reports MiB2 drowning in.

I'm off Wednesday and Thursday, so maybe I'll get a king size peanut M&Ms and smuggle in a Dr. Pepper and catch Reign of Fire then on the matinee discount.

As usual, it's past dawn and I'm past bedtime, so on to the news stuff.

• Vandals attack a synagogue in the UK, part of a rising amount of fascist right wing activity across Europe.  One funny thing in the article:

A burnt torah scroll, a swastika scrawled on a wall and virulent anti-Semitic graffiti greeted the elderly members of Wales's oldest Jewish community yesterday as they opened the door to their synagogue.

"T4 Jewish C**ts from Hitler," was daubed on the wall – an apparent reference to the Nazis' T-4 euthanasia programme, which was responsible for the deaths of thousands of disabled people during the Second World War.

Yes, "an apparent reference".  They're not sure though.  And maybe they didn't mean "Hitler", the WW2 Nazi guy, but this other guy's dog, who he named Hitler.

• This is weird.

The corpse of a woman who died more than 2,000 years ago has been found well preserved in a mystery fluid in eastern China, state media reported today.

The body of the woman, who was believed to have lived during the Western Han Dynasty (206 BC - 24 AD), still had some of her skin, muscle tissue and veins, according to the Xinhua news agency.

They don't know what the fluid is/was yet.  I suspect it's the blood of newborns, whose hearty souls have sustained her through the eons of her undead slumber.  Or maybe rain water.

• A man who called a woman a "Nigger" in Lancaster Pennsylvania was sentenced to 30 days in jail and a $200 fine.  Perhaps he deserved to be punched out, but is this really illegal?  I mean we do have a variety of constitutional provisions in this country that address this sort of freedom of speech type issue.  The article gutlessly doesn't mention the race of anyone involved, though the implication is the guy was white and the women were black.  Which I'd think would factor in legally; if he could have said the exact same thing to another person (who wasn't black) and not had it be a crime.  Offensive language is entirely in the ear of the beholder, after all.

• If you are lucky enough to have escaped a fascist-style country, it's probably best if you don't return for a funereal.

After learning that his mother had died, Mr Khordadian returned to Iran and spent a couple of  months visiting relatives and friends. He was arrested at the airport when he tried to leave.

His horrible sin?  Making Iranian folk dance videos while living in California for the last 22 years.  He's was able to get out of Iranian prison after a few months, but they have revoked his passport, and he's now stuck in Iran and unable to leave for 10 years.

What I'm wondering is how did he live in the US for 22 years, and he's not a citizen?  Dual citizenship?  Illegal alien?  I would think that if he had switched to US citizenship, this would be an international incident by now.  It occurs to me that there probably is not a US embassy in Iran, given what happened to the last one there in the revolution in the 70's, but obviously the US government would be making noise about our citizen being held hostage there; if he were a US citizen.

• I wrote a couple of days ago about the "authorities" wild goose chasing around after every single terrorist threat.  The media isn't any better, though at least they'll write insulting articles about being hoaxed after the fact.

• A rather distasteful story, with an absolutely hideous photo of a grotesquely fat man's naked stomach.  In fact I'm not sure why I'm even posting about it.  I guess to share my pain.

PORKY Shaun Reaney was saved by his beer gut when thugs slashed open his belly with a circular saw. The 22-stone builder suffered a gaping 18-inch wound that would have killed a normal weight man. But docs were able to sew up the wound without complications — because the blade did not get through his blubber.

Lest you wonder, a "stone" is an archaic UK term of weight, corresponding to about 15 pounds, or just under 7kg, if you prefer metric.  So the butterball weighs 330lbs, and it looks like maybe half of that's in his gut.

His wife Theresa, 36, said: “The docs told me if he had been ten stone lighter he would have died. The saw would have sliced into his internal organs. When Shaun came round he reminded me that his years of boozing had saved his life.”

She's awfully forgiving, considering she has to see him naked and be trapped beneath him once or twice a month when his grease-clogged arteries supply sufficient blood to his penis for it to become functional.  Also nice of her and the police (and the article) to avoiding pointing out that if he'd weighed 10 stone less he might have been able to move quickly enough to not get nearly killed in the first place.

The whole story seems a bit suspect, what with mystery assailants attacking him with his own masonry tool, and then stealing his truck.  If you were the suspicious type you might think he'd had an accident and invented this to cover it up, or that he'd gone to buy drugs and it turned bad.  Hard to see why four guys trespassing on a soccer field would have turned so quickly to attempted murder.  Though there are a bunch of articles lately about violent mobs of drunken English, usually involving footie.

n Yahoo I saw this interesting article about hackers working on programs to help people, rather than their normal goals of gaining access to your PC so they can use it to destroy commercial websites or trade pirated software.

The new software they (the hackers) are creating and distributing are various types of super privacy additions to browsers and chat clients.  These can of course by used by terrorists, child pornographers, and the hackers themselves to continue doing whatever in secret.  However they can also be used by people trapped in countries with repressive governments (such as China, Iran, Iraq, etc) to surf any sites they like, in secret.

An international hacker group calling itself Hactivismo released a program on Saturday called Camera/Shy that allows Internet users to conceal messages inside photos posted on the Web, bypassing most known police monitoring methods.

In addition, "Mixter," an internationally known German hacker, said Hactivismo was preparing in coming weeks to launch technology, which if adopted widely could allow anyone to create grassroots, anonymous networks where Internet users worldwide could access and share information without a trace.

This is of course totally against what most companies and especially law enforcement wants, what with plans for universal identification online, for ease of shopping and security, as well as surveillance. The hackers are showing some publicity savvy, I'll give them that.

Six/Four protocol designer "Mixter" told Reuters that the system is named in honor of the date when Chinese authorities cracked down on democracy activists in Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989.

There is a lot more technical info in the article about how such software will work, and the interesting thing about six/four is that it will only work if lots of people around the world use it.  It's possible to tell if it's being used, and if only a few people are using it, then it could apparently be tracked.  Given that these hackers are the type who are constantly passing around infected programs to get backdoors on your computer already, it feels slightly insane to intentionally install their stuff, for whatever noble purpose.

Towards the end of the article there is a funny gaff:

In the future they plan to develop programs that will allow anonymous direct email, file trading and untraceable chat programs that bypass conventional Internet monitoring.

The latter is especially important in places like China, where online chat is more popular than Web surfing. The group's work can be found on the Internet at .

That's not a typo, the sentence just ends with an obviously missing link.  Removed pre-publication by an editor?  Something the article author meant to add in but didn't get back to?

It will be interesting to see where this goes in the future.  Experienced Internet users want privacy and anonymity, while the censoring governments want to keep control of their citizens, and various corporations want to give everyone an ID# online.  Will we see the FBI, Chinese government, and Microsoft collaborating to battle the hacker's anonymity measures?

I've seen various articles in the past about major computer makers such as Intel specially-modifying their servers and other hardware for sale to China, to enable the country to more-easily set up their international firewalls.  Businesses are always more interested in profits and sales than in trying to encourage democracy or freedom, so it's not as if they wouldn't capitulate to whatever they had to in order to move more merchandise.

I think that the early (and current) Internet days of user privacy and secrecy are coming to an end.  Most people online now are normal adults, with jobs, families, etc.  They don't care about piracy or warez or being anonymous so they can hack IRC chats or whatever.  These are people with real lives, 5 credit cards, children, and a mortgage.  They don't care about totally anonymous surfing, since they never do anything they feel a need to hide.  Maybe they don't want their boss to know they're looking at a new job on Monster.com, or their wife to know of their porn surfing, but unless there are new browser features that expose (to anyone) everything you've been doing online, the average user is fine with their current level of privacy.  Most people know so little of how their browser cache or cookies or IP# identify them that they probably think they are largely anonymous now (hint, you aren't) so don't see any need for more cloaking, and I doubt that will change.

So what will the Internet be in a few years?  There are more commercial sites every day; sites and services like Amazon.com and Pay Pal and Ebay that more or less require an actual identity to use them fully.  Microsoft tried to put the unique permanent ID feature in with WinXP, until bad publicity forced them to disable it.  I think that contrary to what hackers want, anonymity is steadily drying up on the Internet, and will probably continue doing so in the future.  If you want to have useful services on the Internet, you'll need an identity to access them.  You can't wear a skimask to a bank and expect them to give you your money, just because you assure them you aren't a criminal.  But while there is less anonymity on a personal level, savvy users will probably continue to use secrecy software like the hacker stuff listed above for some purposes.  Activate cloaking mode to surf and check your hotmail, deactivate it from time to time for shopping or checking your official email.  How long that is possible to continue with the corporations who run the Internet working to remove the secrecy remains to be seen.

<-- Yesterday -- Daily Main Page -- Tomorrow -->

 

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.