![]() |
|
|
Conjoined Twins |
|
If you share a leg or an arm, who gets to control it? Do you both have control over it, but one of you is stronger with it? How do you decide who gets to do what on a given day, if you have different desires? The whole thing can't be much of a picnic, given how virtually all of them seem to choose to undergo very dangerous and frequently fatal surgery to try and get unhooked from each other. As I said, the whole thing fascinates me. And with articles on conjoined twins appearing more and more often in the media (for no reason I can discern), there have been a lot of opportunities to write about them lately.
After the recent rash of human conjoined twin stories, today we've got a much cuter one. About tortoises.
No pictures, apparently. The funny part is next:
Now where is the footage of that on one of those American's Funniest Animal Home Video shows? Anyway, did the one on top never realize that it was stuck to another turtle, and that no matter how much it kicked it would not be turning back over until the giant hand of god came along and flipped it back? Or could they turn over sometimes, if they got a good lurch and some leverage off the side of the tank? That sort of thing would be really bizarre in the wild, since obviously the one on top would eventually starve to death, if it couldn't eat while upside down. And then it would die and kill the other one as their shared rotting flesh suppurated. Or something. What happens to one when the other dies is fascinating, when it comes to conjoined twins. In the most famous US case, that of Eng and Chang Bunker (who were born in Siam and became very famous in America, apparently inadvertently coining the "Siamese twins" term) Chang woke up one day to find Eng dead, and then died himself a few hours later. The cause of death? Blood loss. His heart kept pumping blood, but most of it went into his brother's body while no heart was pumping there to send it back over. Which makes you wonder, could conjoined twins live on if one died, and they took the shared organs out of the dead one and put the into the living one? How do you separate out the blood vessels and such? What if one were shot and went into a coma, while the other one was okay, but they couldn't wake up the comatose one. Would the awake one carry his/her twin around on a stretcher or something? How could you live with this unconscious body stuck to you at all times? I'd say that would be a good plot for a movie, but the Farrelly Brothers recently went there, with pretty lackluster results. Of course they were going from the comedy angle, rather than the horrific one that I'd choose.
The Rotten.com-esque two-headed baby girl died during surgery to try and remove her second head. I glanced at the news articles and photos, but didn't read them too closely, or blog about it, since it was just too freaky. For some reason, there's yet another weirdly-conjoined twin in the news about every other week now, and we've moved far beyond the old days of "joined at the hip" or "sharing a liver" connections. Now every kid has half their unborn, undeveloped brother's head in their left ass cheek, or they share a spinal cord, or something else downright freakish. This girl was a sort of half-ogre, with another human head joined to hers, with part of a brain, but they were joined in about the least attractive way possible; at the top of the skull, facing in opposite directions. So you've got the one normal human child, with about half the head and face of another person on top of her head, upside down, facing in the other direction. I don't know if it was potentially fatal to her to just leave it alone, or if it would have caused her to have a brain hemorrhage or it would have died and she'd have gotten necrosis or what, but I don't think anyone could envision her living a normal life with that thing on top of her skull. At least not unless really big hats suddenly came back into style. Plus they were probably afraid that it would come to life and start staring at other people or flapping its toothless mouth or something.
In an effort to be more thought-provoking and less cheap shotting, take a look at that picture. I'm pretty inured to grossness, and yet I find it uncomfortable to look at, to the point that I've cropped and reduced it in size quite a bit from even the version on Yahoo. Maybe it's just me, but this picture creeps me out and I'd rather not see it, or other medical disaster photos. Yet this, and bloody photos of war dead, bomb casualties, murder victims, etc are considered perfectly fine to post in the newspaper, magazines, or on major Internet news sites. All places you can never find a photo of a naked human body, or even the shapely, interesting-ornamented boobie of a formerly popular female pop vocalist. Can anyone explain why? What sort of person would rather see this, or have their children see this, than the partially-nude breast of an attractive female? Why are people so fucked up about sexuality, or even just minor partial nudity in the US? It disturbs and depresses me.
This is the hideous horror story photo of the day. At least that's my take on it, some people probably find it cute or fascinating or want to cry. I just think of the freakshow life ahead for the creature. Well, actually I find it fascinating, but I'd rather read about it afterwards, and pretend it was fiction. It's amazing to see animals with two heads, snakes and such, but a human? That's just very wrong, horror movie (or comedy, more likely) type stuff. Imagine two boys like that? They can grow up and if they are large rent themselves out to costume parties as an ogre. Or do comedy routines and argue with each other, and hit each other in the head. Thinking about it more seriously, imagine what life will be like? There isn't any news item about the kid(s) yet, how healthy they are, if there is really one body and 2 heads, how many legs and arms, if there are two spines all overlapping and causing problems, etc. Just imagine if the spines merge and the kid can walk, move normally, etc. I'm assuming it's really one body and two heads, and is functional. What if one is a boy and the other a girl? Is that possible with one set of genitals? Which head would be dominant? Would one have more control over the body than the other? Would they take turns? Would one eat more or less? Would they have different senses of taste and smell? Different likes and dislikes in TV shows (side by side TVs with headphones for each to watch a different show?) or books to read? How would they be in school? Would they share a grade, or each have to take tests individually, with the same hands filling in the questions? How could a teacher know which one was doing what? One head could study English and the other Math, and they could help each other on tests. Can you imagine them blindfolding one head while the other one takes a test, to prevent cheating? I would assume that conjoined twins very soon lose any sense of modesty or privacy around each other. I mean you're glued to a person for life, it's not like you're going to stress on them picking their nose, you have to sort of assist going to the bathroom, there's never any privacy from each other, except maybe if the other person is asleep. This applies more to more conventional Siamese twins, rather than this two-headed one in the picture above. Another wonder is what happens when one dies. A quote from the linked page in the last paragraph.
Now that is goddamn freaky. The sexual aspect of life is really weird to contemplate as well. Here's another quote from that page on two boys who each had both arms and were separate from the belly up, but had only two legs, penis, etc.
I can't imagine how that would be. I mean they have the same penis, both of them have to feel it when it's aroused, but different wives. That's got to be some fascinating courtship and mating ritual there. The famous Chang and Eng brothers are similar, though they only shared a fleshy band in their midsection and a liver. But when you are a foot from another guy's face, and you both have wives and end up with 21 children between you, you've obviously worked out some way of handling bedroom manners. Does one of the twins just pretend to not notice, or look away, or feign sleep while your brother's wife is lying naked on top of you, having sex with him? Hot three or four-ways galore? One other quote from another page with short case studies.
So they have basically one body from the pelvic bone down. They do not share control of the lower body, since it took them years to learn to walk, with each controlling one leg. But since they only have one crotch, who controls the bladder? Who feels sexual sensations? I don't really want to interview or meet twins/a twin, but I would like to read some more of the nitty gritty info, beyond what the relatively superficial website articles I've seen in the last hour of searching has shown me. |
|
| Return to the Articles Index. |
|
All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007. |