![]() |
|
|
Sex Toys |
|
Most recent additions on top of this page.
Here's a news item I want to comment on. Sensation-deadening condoms. I find it interesting since there's some new article about them, with a German company making them. The article about it has been one of the most popular on Yahoo for a few days, for reasons unclear to me. Who really cares? Or is anything sort of explicitly about sex just irresistible to the Yahoo news story-forwarding masses? Before I get into commenting on it, I want to point out that this isn't even new news. I remembered writing about that before, on this site, and a quick google search turned up the day. It was last June 19th (the day before my B-day, coincidentally) and the article about it can be seen here. That article is a lot more interesting, and the numbing condoms aren't even the main thrust of it. So to speak. The article is mostly about smaller sized condoms for the juvenile market, which I'm still not sure is even legal, with the numbing ones only mentioned after that. I don't know if this sounds hopelessly immodest or what, but I really can't believe this is a necessary product. My impression has always been that most guys hate using condoms since they take away so much of the sensation, and that achieving orgasm with one on was usually sort of difficult. That's certainly been my experience, but various women I've asked about it have said that most men they've been with were usually easily-able to come with one on, and often they (the men) were still of the "two minute brothers" type. In that case I don't think a condom with anything short of Novocain would matter, since obviously it's all mental. The guys are popping so quickly since they are frantically excited, or nervous, or whatever, and it's got next to nothing to do with the vaginal sensations, and next to everything to do with what's going on in their minds. And if they are so obsessed with vagina that they can't help but pop almost immediately, I don't think some numbing to cut the sensation will matter much. The only benefit the numbing condoms might have for guys like that would be almost a placebo effect. The guy thinks it'll cut the sensation, and thinks he'll last longer, and therefore he does, whether the condom makes any difference or not. Why doesn't the company just make the condoms much thicker? That would be easier, I'd think, and would cut off a lot more sensation than some mild anesthetic. Though since it's not all high tech it wouldn't get publicity or generate curiosity sales, so there's my answer.
One of the sillier laws in the US is found in Texas. There it's illegal to sell sex toys, and if you have more than six of them it's a felony, as you are considered to be dealing them. Some woman got stopped for a DUI, and while searching her truck the cops found a box full of dildos. Seventeen of them, and she might get up to two years in prison for her horrible offense. She's undoubtedly guilty of possession with intent to distribute; the question is if anyone is actually going to enforce the law against such a stupid victimless crime.
Dildo discussion. Now there's a phrase you don't hear every day, huh? The following stems from my first seeing this amusing story about a sex toy recall. There's a more salacious version of it here.
Yes, you heard right. "Rabbit-eared sex toy". Another phrase you don't hear every day.
Their official site lists the recall, but they also have the vibrator still on their sex toy page, with a "quality assured" tag. Different model? Okay, so you're probably like me, wondering what the hell a "Rampant Rabbit" is, what it looks like, what's with the beads, etc. Either that or you're looking towards your knickers drawer with a guilty smile.
Ah, so that's why they are now well known enough to post news about.
This isn't the exact brand that's being recalled, but it's obviously a rip off of the same concept. The point seems to be that it's a rotating plunger device, attached to a vibrating rabbit-shaped shaft. The rabbit ears are flexible and soft, for clitoral stimulation (keep that in mind next time you're stabbing at your gf's little man in the boat like you're trying to sink it) and the beads in the shaft do... something. I don't see how they'd work exactly. I guess they provide a contoured feeling, molding to your internal shape better than the traditional "molded veins" dildo construction. Yes men, we're pretty well obsolete at this point. The study of female sex toys can illustrate many truths. For one thing, women are a goddamned puzzle. You see a male sex toy? Most men have no need for one, being as their hands are more than sufficient for the task. The ones you do see are either molded latex of the "pocket pussy" type, or else the somewhat frightening penis pumps, that look way too much like some sort of Bobbitizer, in my opinion. I've never used any of these, tragically. You don't see male ones that have multi-vibrating attachments, testicle-ticklers, prostate-massagers, and heating and vibrating action all in one. Men just don't need that; we'd probably orgasm in about 10 seconds with that level of stimulation. It's very seldom for a man that "I take too long to come" is a big complaint. The main problem is that men are hornier, and have a much larger surface area to stimulate. Even the smallest penis is far larger than a clitoris, and since very few women can get off from vaginal stimulation alone, they've got to try and concentrate their stimulation on a far smaller spot. I'm not going to get into nerve ending counts, but a comparison I once heard was that a man should try masturbating by stimulating nothing but one half of the very tip of his penis, and see how easy it was. So men have it easier, in terms of getting off, and their sex toys reflect that. Almost all the male ones are basically a hole that you insert yourself into. Yes, there are male dildo-shaped vibrators and butt plugs and cock rings, but for the most part it's a hole, and you put your dick into it. The only real breakthrough in male toys is that some of them allow hands-free operation, or at least remove the need for a stroking movement. I'm not including Real Dolls in this listing, since they're like a whole 'nother level, designed more for mental stimulation than the actual physical sensations. That and they're creepy. Female toys, on the other hand, have more technology than the Apollo Space Program. The old days of rubber dildos are long gone. Now everything is made of some sort of space age material, warms to body temperature, and tends to have several individual motors. Men don't come with these parts. Men have a rubbery dildo-like attachment that generally can't remain firm for all that long, big clumsy motor oil-stained fingers, and an easily-exhausted tongue that unlike rabbit ears, comes with taste buds and an unfortunate proximity to the nose. Neither of which are conducive to long term use in the manner and location women would most like the attendant tongue applied. So are men inferior to a good rabbit-ear vibrator? Sexually yes, but good luck getting the rabbit-eared vibrator to mow the lawn or buy you shoes, honey. One reassuring (to men) feature of sex toys is that you never see any female dildos advertised as "painfully large". In fact most of them are pretty modest in size, and the ones with butterfly or rabbit ear attachments don't appear to be more than 4 or 5 inches long. They say they are 7 or 8 inches, but that's including the shaft below the rabbit attachment, which is a rip off, since you can't use that part anyway. This gives evidence that women don't necessarily need to feel direct pressure on their appendix to be satisfied. The only problem is that they (women) do very much tend to prefer a larger penis. I've written about this before, but in my informal surveys, results are running around 98% who say that size very much does matter. Women can and will dump guys who have small dicks. Now if they are deeply in love they'll obviously put up with less than man-donkey, but they would prefer larger. So why don't they buy fireplace-log sized dildos?
It could be any or none of the above. I don't have an answer for it myself. If any female readers (or men who are good at pretending) want to write in and give me their opinion, I'll be happy to take it under consideration. |
|
| Or as a gay friend of mine asked, "Why would you want a clit tickler on a dildo?" Let me know. |
|
All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007. |