![]() |
|
|
Breasts | ||
|
Seriously, why are these female body parts so fascinating to men? Why don't men develop identical fetishes for female hips, or knees, or ear lobes? What is it about the breasts that so obsess most men? It's a reasonable question, but not one you're going to find the answer to on this page. Instead, you'll find collected blog entries on the topic, in which we can all laugh at the absurdity of booby-obsession, while getting a healthy eyeful ourselves. More recent additions are added to the top of the page.
Survey shows that women who get cosmetic breast implants have a higher suicide rate than average women.
My immediate thought was that since lots of miserable, shallow women get implants hoping they'll make things better, this is no real surprise. The article mentions this possibility, but doesn't really spell it out for people. I'm sure that surveys would reveal women who obsess over their appearance in any way, women who are bulimic/anorexic, women who get deeply into goth stuff and start dying everything black and wearing 5 pounds of silver jewelry, women who get a dozen tattoos, etc... all have higher risks for suicide than women who do not. This all goes for men as well, but to a lesser extent since men don't tend to associate so much of their mental state of mind with their perceived appearance. Miserable people kill themselves, but before they do they often do weird things to try and make themselves feel better. It seems like common sense to me that some miserable women who are unhappy with how they look think that bigger, perkier boobies will make them happier. And if having every man maintain steady eye contact with their chest doesn't improve their state of mind, they might kill themselves. A really thorough study on this would examine suicidal women who got implants and suicidal women who didn't, and we might see that getting implants actually helped. Take 50 suicidal women, half of whom get implants and half who don't. Say 5 of the new bra-size girls kill themselves, and 10 of the flat-chesters do the same. Both would be well above the average suicide rate, but implants would actually have saved five lives! Lest you take the wrong impression from this, I am not Howard Stern, and I am not a big fan of cosmetic implants, primarily since most women get ones that are way too big and shapeless. The whole "beachball with a nipple" look can be tempting in a push up bra and a tight shirt, but it's nasty nude, looking way too plastic and artificial.
Article about some female German pop singer who got breast implants that were paid for by the national health insurance. Some people are taking issue with their (high) taxes going to pay for elective crap like this, for a woman who can certainly afford her own medical care. I love her quote though:
So um, ballet actually shrinks your breasts? I wasn't aware of that. Doesn't seem to work on the men. (And no, I'm not going to search out a photo of one of those guys in tights who appear to be smuggling a sack of golf balls, just to make a joke about it. Use your damn imagination.) Anyway, this isn't a good angle or picture of her size, but um... what implants? Is this a "pre" photo or what? Click the image to see the full sized shot. That's optional though, since I didn't crop off the newsworthy portion.
I don't subscribe (or at least am attempting to cancel my subscription) to the (almost-uniquely) American notion that topless women are somehow naughty to see, so I don't have any issues with topless photos on this page. I don't post shots of full nudity, or sexual stuff, but I'll talk about anything and show innocent nudity. If you are offended by bare female breasts, try to get over it; your puritanical attitudes mark you for a silly American. In addition, you'll probably want to stop reading now. So it all began with this photo that I saw on the Denmark Yahoo. It's absurd, showing some woman in a fashion designer's masterpiece, one that makes her look like a Mardi Gras float. Not like a person you'd see at Mardi Gras; I mean an actual float. Click and see, if you think I'm exaggerating. It's the most absurd thing you'll ever see a fashion model wear on the runway. Even worse (better?) than the hoods and nooses (and titties) look from last month. The fact that it's "Pret a Porter" clothing just makes it more amusing. I sent the link to a friend, and she "Oh FFS"ed it, as I expected and as the photo deserved. Then a few minutes later I saw this one, from UK Yahoo, which is just about as likely to show up in real life, though is a lot more enjoyable to view. After I sent it over, the friend commented that the woman's black nipples were horribly unattractive. I hadn't really noticed it, so went back to take another look.Well I had noticed that there was a dark nipple visible, but I'd just sort of glanced initially, and assumed it was some sort of stick on nipple cover, as models are known to wear from time to time. Upon a closer look, I think I was wrong, and that it's her actual body. I can't believe that's the real color though, having seen some thousands of them in photos over the years and several of them in person, and never having seen one this dark on a white woman. Models wear body make up and lip stick and other such stuff, so why not some nipple-shadow to darken for the visual effect? Not like she doesn't have enough raccoon-eyes stuff to go around. Is the picture edited?
Back to the black-nippled model; the photo is from the wire and on Yahoo, so I'm not entertaining the possibility that it's been tampered with. How it looks is how the woman looked, so any coloration tweaking is on her, I think. My initial point with this was that the conversation with my friend turned to preferred nipple/areola coloration. Oh wait, before that I saw this shot, which is funny and awful, and I think faked/exaggerated. Look if you want, it's some African tribeswoman with those very ugly "cue ball in a sock" shaped breasts that a lifetime of nursing and going topless produce. Anyway, the conversation turned to ideal coloration. I, as it turns out, like either very dark or very light nipple color. The redhead look, with very pale skin and light pink hair and nipples is very sexy to me, as is a darker complexion and very dark nipples. Not black skin/nipples, since there's no contrast there, but some light-skinned ethnic women have skin tone like a white woman with a good tan, and very dark nipples. That I like. However, as I felt a need to point out after a few minutes, nipple color is about #50 on my list of things to notice/worry about on a woman's body. Breast shape in general is far more important, though probably still not in my top 10. I checked my folder of girl photos, which has been updated very little in the last year or so, but which I used to add to quite regularly. (There is a direct cause and effect here tied to how many naked woman pictures I view, as you could probably have guessed.) The photos are sorted by dominant attribute, and the number of each type of shot is a relatively accurate gauge of what I like to see on a woman. In the folder is like butt01-47, for example. Beauty01-22, eagle01-18, etc. Boobies? Tits01-06. Now lots of the other shots show breasts, and they might be a big part of why I liked the shot enough to save it, but they (boobies) aren't the primary attribute of the woman in the picture. Of the 6 tits (well, 12 literally) two are very light pink on redheads, two are very light brown on breasts of almost identical color, one pair are brown, but capping such exquisitely-shaped breasts as to challenge Michelangelo, were he alive today to attempt to preserve them in marble. The other pair are very dark brown, on a dark-complexioned white woman.
I wasn't going to include any, since this is way too adult or horn dog an update already, but here's probably the best of the pics, at least in terms of breast shape. IMHO, of course. I'd say that her nips have been colorized somewhat, to make them so nearly identical to her skin tone; especially as dark as her hair is. She's almost certainly got implants as well, given the size of them and the lack of sag, though it's hard to tell exactly with the demi-cup giving a bit of a boost. So it's not implants I object to, it's the loss of pretty pokey shape that is so often brought about with the increased implant size.
I apologize for this update, it's sort of going nowhere. I'm tired though, and it's late, so I'll just go to bed now before I start a follow-up article on proper labia dimensions.
A new photo for today is the amusingly-proportioned Miss America. Miss Arkansas won the swimsuit contest, and there are two pretty obvious reasons why. My first look at this I just laughed and sent it to a girl for her to laugh. She pointed out the hook nose on the poor woman, and I must admit that I had only glanced at her face, what with my attention focused elsewhere. On a second look, the woman's been beat with an ugly stick, and looks like she's got Tammy Faye doing her make up. I bet she's not made eye-contact with a man since she was 14. There were three rounds of the swimsuit competition, and three ugly suits. Examples of each are on the page.
Interesting article about bras. Yes, boobie-holders. Some quotes.
Jubbiles! Sorry, just had to interject there.
The article makes no mention whatsoever of implants, breast lifts, or other such things, oddly enough. Nor any option for men to pay for admission to one of these "fittings".
Boobies. What the hell is with those things, and the reaction to them from people? Women obsess over them, their own and those of other women. I don't mean lesbians who might harbor some sexual attraction to them, I mean just your average hetero by default female. The worry about framing her puppies, how much they'll poke out, if the nipples will be visible, if she should do a push up or just go for comfortable support, and all of that. I'm not blaming them or congratulating them, I'm just pondering. But it's men, obviously, who are the real obsessers. I've never been a "boob man". I notice a nice pair, and if a woman is dressed it's obviously one of the main things you notice if they are prominent, but generally speaking they aren't a major preoccupation of mine. I notice face, hair, butt, overall fitness, then breasts. If I'm checking a girl out, that is. And I generally only notice "them" if they are excessively large or small, or on display in a tank top or the like. I seem to be in the minority in my lack of boobie-obsession though, given comments from other men. That guy in Rubio's I wrote about yesterday, for example. I mentioned Mimi Rogers above, and she's a good example. I find her naked to be actually frightening. Almost horrifying. Click this for a link to what I mean. Or don't; you can just get a pair of flesh-colored plastic bags, put an orange in each, and tape them to your chest. Overly large boobies always repulse me, and hers are especially awful, since they aren't fake. Fake ones at least stand up and look somewhat like boobies are supposed to look, in terms of shape and tautness. Hers are just these huge saggy hot water bottles, and not only do I not want to be see or be near them, I want them to not actually exist. I wouldn't bring her up, but for the fact that lots of guys love that. Tom Cruise was married to her, and I've seen her specifically mentioned numerous times in terms of some guy's favorite model/actress. She was in the first Austin Powers movie and looked pretty good in a leather body suit, but that was with much support. She took that off it would look like someone letting the air out of a pair of balloons. The woman is reasonable pretty and has a decent body, but obviously her big selling point is up front. So what is it about boobies that men so worship them, even when they (the boobies) are so far out of proper proportion? Tons of strippers have watermelon-sized implants, and find guys who like that. My long-time theory is that it's an Oedipus condition. Not the literal Freudian theory, which has been pretty well discredited by now, but that the boobies are fixated upon at an infantile age. After all, what do they look like to the baby then? They are enormous, milk-swollen, bigger than the infant's entire head. Some men retain this subconsciously and it becomes sexualized once they go through puberty and see what makes girls different, and then they fixate on that as adults. I don't think it's really this in every case; I doubt there's 100% overlap between breast-feeding vs. bottle-feeding and large breast obsession in adult men, and I'm pretty damn sure no one has ever done a large research project on it. Then again it's possible, given the sort of stuff psych majors have to come up with for their senior projects. I'd also say that boobie obsession is an infantile thing, or at least juvenile. When boys and girls hit puberty, what do boys first notice about girls? Bigger breasts, of course. At 12 or 13 the average boy has only the vaguest idea of female genitalia, but he certainly notices breasts on women all of a sudden, and notices them appearing on girls his age as well. Some guys get hung up on this first sexual imagery and never get entirely over it. Sure they like the rest of a woman, ass and panty hamster, and all, but their first erotic fixation remains. How that ties into them liking really large boobies is unexplained. Do most men who like boobies best (of all the parts of a woman) like really big ones? I have no answer for that. Clearly a survey needs to be done! Let me know how it goes. The opposite type of man should probably be examined as well, if you could find enough of them. I'm one, I guess. I notice breasts, but they aren't at all my prime fixation. When I see nude pictures that's not what I look at, and if boobies are all that's in the picture, I don't really see any point in looking at it. Numerous magazines sell millions of copies by showing (Playboy) or nearly showing (Maxim, FHM, Gear) boobies, lots of internet sites (UK tabloids) show just those and are very popular, and I don't understand why. I'll glance at the pictures, and if the woman is especially beautiful I'll look at more than one, but generally my reaction is, "They're just tits?" As far as I know I was breast fed, and I remember being enraptured by boobies when I was about 12, and finding the other parts of a woman rather mysterious and somewhat unpleasant (when I'd get a rare look at a Penthouse, rather than the much tamer "breasts and fur bikini" style Playboy photo). The question, if there is one, is how I went from that stage, to relative indifference to visual depictions of boobies later in life. Especially when compared to guys who have the breast obsessed impulses.
All examples here have been in terms of looking, either at photos or "can't touch" situations like a stripper. I'm not talking or even really thinking about what guys might like in actual sexual practice, like with a real live girl. Once there is vagina available I assume virtually every hetero man wants to copulate. Probably some men who are the most breast obsessed would prefer to just play with the boobies, and probably just look at them while actually humping away, but that's a bit more than I'm prepared to visualize or discuss right here, right now. I also have zero facts or stats or figures to back it up, and it's a bit too serious for my usual generalizations. |
|||
| Return to the Articles Index. |
|
All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007. |