![]() |
|
|
Weird Animal Stories | |||||
|
This page collects news item entries featuring odd animal stories, many of them including personal stories, as is my habit. More recent additions are on top.
Another article says that though the bird is 104 years old, they've been known to make it past 110, so it might have plenty of time yet. Bit mangy at this point, but hey in 70 or 80 years we'll see just how beau-e-ful is your plu'meech. Now that's a live parrot.
So that world's longest snake, the one that was said to be an incredible 49 feet, dwarfing the previous largest snake in history at 33 feet... is actually just a rather pedestrian 21 feet long.
Okay, I could believe that it was say 35 feet, and they exaggerated it upwards a ways; it's hard to estimate snake length when they're all curled around and such. But 21 vs. 49? 6.5m vs. 15m? You seldom see measurement inaccuracies of that scale that don't involve a man and his penis.
I didn't think the snake looked nearly 50 feet long in the photos, but figured I wasn't seeing the whole creature in the photos; that some coils were out of the frame off to the side. Here are a few more pics of the creature though, and while this is a very thick snake, it's clearly not anywhere near even 30 feet, compared to the human who is probably just 5 feet or so.
On the bright side, since this one is just 21 feet and seems to be in good health, it's capable of growing a great deal longer. It's just unlikely it'll ever get more than 26 or 28 feet at most. Here's a picture I took at the SD zoo over Xmas holiday that features a good sized albino Burmese Python, and while there I saw and photographed an even larger python. That one was mostly curled up in the water tank though, making the size hard to estimate. This one is all stretched out and it's probably 15-16 feet. You can go buy one in the store tomorrow and grow your own to this size, though it'll take a decade or two. My Red-Tailed boa was young and about 4 feet when I got it, and over the 7 years I owned it grew to about 8 feet, and I was feeding it a fraction of what it would have liked to eat, and didn't have it in a giant enclosure. It could have gotten a lot larger a lot more quickly.I'm not really recommending that you own a constricting serpent in excess of 8 or 10 feet, but if you want to and you have an entire room to convert into a snake cage, don't mind regularly scooping up sofa cushion-sized piles of watery shit that smells worse than anything you can imagine, and have a ready supply of small rabbits, cats, or dogs to keep it fed when it gets this large, go for it. And send me some pictures.
This sort of thing is why I love the Internet. In the old days, when some peasants in a god forsaken village in the middle of the jungle found a 50 foot snake, word would have taken years, if ever, to filter out. Now it's on the Internet within a week.
Now that is a big snake. I've long liked snakes and had a couple for pets, and therefore have paid attention to the size range. Anacondas get the most publicity for being large, probably since they have a cooler name, but reticulated pythons are actually larger, though lighter than an anaconda of the same length. Of course this one is so much longer than any known anaconda that it's taking the overall size and weight title by over 25%. I find it amazing that a snake this much longer than any other ever found could be out there, but since they live in remote jungles and are secretive animals, I guess it's not a huge surprise. There are doubtless hundreds of snakes from 33 to 48 feet out there, and probably some even longer than this one, yet to be found.
Crocodile Hunter nutcase Steve Irwin has successfully procreated, and he's starting the baby off where he's gone himself.
If you've ever seen this guy on TV, there's nothing about this story that you find surprising. He has no regard whatsoever for his own life and is constantly leaping into waist deep water with man-eating animals, tackling crocodiles that outweigh him by a factor of 3 or 4, grabbing poisonous snakes by the tails, and so on. He was parodied on a South Park episode by a crazy man who liked to catch animals and really piss them off by jamming his thumbs up their assholes. Literally. I don't think the real Steve Irwin has actually done that, at least not on purpose, but it's not real far from what he does do in real life. So while he didn't think what he was doing was endangering his kid, and while I'm sure he's fed crocs hunks of raw meat hundreds of times without incident (he's still got all his hands and fingers, after all) you've got to exercise a bit more judgment than this. If nothing else, him leaping up and down and banging the baby around can't be good for the little grub's neck and spine.
I posted news on Friday about the latest deaths due a pit bull. That
case was unusual, since in it two stupid rednecks, father and sun, managed to
drown themselves in an old industrial pit that they meant for their dog.
Today's news has a case of the more
traditional method of death due to pit bull. A pack of them got loose from
some guy's house, and ran down, mauled and partially consumed 81 year old woman. Deputies said Broom, who had
just returned from a doctor's appointment, was lying naked and unconscious on
the ground, her clothes having been ripped off, and she had numerous gashes
and lacerations over her body. Detectives learned from the Medical Examiner's
Office on Saturday that injuries, from her head to her legs, caused her to
bleed to death, according to Sheriff's Maj. Mike McQuaig. As is usually the case in dog killings, there were plenty of warning signs
that the animals were dangerous, but no one did anything about it in time. Why
do we have a zero tolerance policy in schools that expels girls who have a
bottle of Advil, but allows people to keep vicious and dangerous animals when
it's only a matter of time until they maul or murder someone? And yes, I'm engaging in hyperbole, since if every animal attack that caused
injury resulted in an euthanized animal, there wouldn't be too many pets left. Jinx
and Dusty
would certainly be gone, though I guess Snakers
would be spared. But when dogs are consistently nasty and attacking people, they
are a public danger, and need to be dealt with, whether under the gun or club of
a neighbor acting in self defense, or the needle at the pound after animal
control takes them away. And no, all pit bulls aren't killers, but they're dogs
bred to fight, and are aggressive, so they get a lot less leniency than someone
with a snappy poodle. Smothers and Hector said they
have complained for weeks in calls to Marion County Animal Control about
Freeman's dogs. Others recounted several incidents in which neighbors were
terrified to walk by Freeman's home, or recalled times when his dogs would
attack people. I don't see any reason that the owner of those dogs shouldn't be put away for
murder, or at least manslaughter. I have no patience with people who keep
dangerous animals around, ones who have repeatedly proven their viciousness, and
who then beg for forgiveness when their pet eventually mauls or kills someone.
See it coming or do the time. And it goes without saying that the relatives and
friends of the mauled/dead person should be allowed to kill the dogs however
they see fit, if they so desire. No, that sort of thing won't bring granny back, but if it eases the pain of
her surviving relatives, at least the animals' deaths will serve some purpose. This
story makes me angry.
So she trespassed, ignored caution signs, endangered a rare animal by introducing food (her hand) not on its scientific diet, and they killed... the wolf? Shot the wrong animal, in my opinion. And really, how could they not have scared it away with the loud gun? Or shot it in the leg or something? In the Flux zoo, the keepers would bring out some bolt cutters and that woman would get to spend the next few years learning to wipe left-handed. After she paid a heavy fine and was banned from the zoo for life for fucking with the animals. Would my zoo fine people an arm and a leg for trespassing? Well, not exactly...
Roy, the brunette half of the famous, unambiguously-gay tiger boys Sigfried and Roy, was mauled by a big damn white tiger during a show over the weekend, and has been in the hospital in critical but stable condition ever since.
There are dozens of articles about this and most of them give some history of the flamboyant duo. Or you can check out their timeline on Rotten.com. I had no idea they'd been working together for so long, since the damn 50's, and that they'd never had any animal-related injuries. The first reports about the mauling said that it was the first time they'd had that tiger on stage, so I was thinking, "Nice training, guys." Later articles made clear that that was just a performance piece, and that they'd been working with the tiger for years. So there's really no telling why it got pissed off that night. Bad tuna? I would say more, but I don't have any real opinion about this. It's a shame that wild animals like tigers have to live in captivity, but then again, people are so busy encroaching on their territory and killing them off in the wild that it's captivity or extinction. And if they're going to be in captivity, they might as well learn to do some entertaining tricks for our amusement to earn their keep. Sigfried and Roy treated them well, giving them good food and gentle treatment and nice yards to roam around in, when they weren't humiliating them on stage. Sleeping in the beds of the gayest Las Vegasite since Liberace beats being stuck in a chain link fence pen in some Joe Bob's backyard zoo, or living in a damn bedroom in the projects.
Just a really weird story about some asshole in Canada who wanted a bear cub for a pet. Read the whole thing to be amazed. Here's my quick recap. He grabbed a cub in the water with his jet ski, dragged it down river, dunking it all the time to tire it out, tied it by a paw, dunked it again, half drowned it, and so on. He finally got to the boat dock where the bears gets away again and swims for shore while he is floating away due to his jet ski running out of gas. Meanwhile he's yelling for someone to get a photographer to take some pictures so he can be in the paper with a bear on his jet ski. He has to tackle the cub on land as it gets away again, and finally drives home with it before police show up and make him let the bear go. Eventually wild life rangers arrive and take it out into the woods and release it, but far from where its mother and sibling were last seen. Even if you overlook the obvious animal abuse and idiocy of the whole thing, check out the guy's logic. After people reported him for animal cruelty his reply:
So why did he want the bear in the first place?
So he wants to keep it away from children by... taming it so it will regularly return to the area. And as most people know, animals are never more dangerous than when they are half tame, since they lose their fear of humans. Good thinking, Skeeter. After the whole thing, Dr. Red Neck is not exactly apologetic.
Is there anyone alive who can read this and not pray to god that jackass gets mauled and partially eaten in the immediate future? Or maybe some nut from E.L.F. could take a break from incinerating Hummers long enough to just go and Glock him. Either way...
Here's a cute picture I saw on
Yahoo, and clicked on mostly since it looks a lot like
Yes, elephant shit. If I were cool I'd have just left the last sentence, and maybe even deleted the intro paragraph. It really says all that needs to be said. But since saying far more than needs to be said is sort of a trademark of mine... what's up with the PC-esque terminology? It stands out like a green penguin. "Enrichment item." Who the hell talks like that? And that's followed up by "engage in foraging, playful and problem-solving behavior." Sheesh, is that cloying or what? It just sounds so ridiculously pompous and self-important. Kitty can't just play with a frozen lump of ice with elephant shit inside of it, kitty must be enriched and engage in foraging behavior! So at what point does a Brazilian black jaguar encounter frozen boluses of elephant shit in nature? I mean even if there were every any ice anywhere near Brazil, there certainly aren't any elephants. And why the hell do you give a big kitty frozen elephant shit to play with? I mean is there some primal attraction to it? Why not please deliver some Meow Mix, or a pork chop? Poor kitty; goes to all the trouble to paw at an inexplicably-red, white, and blue ice cube, and comes away with elephant crap for his trouble. Now admittedly, the SD Zoo is just about knee deep in elephant shit, most of which seems to be dropped during the elephant show. So I can understand their desire to dispose of it in creative ways. But still... eww.
This article about a rampaging badger in the UK is getting a lot of play. Apparently it was partially domesticated, got out or was released somehow, and then became super vicious and territorial and started attacking people, and just tore them up.
Well there's a proud moment in law enforcement, eh? Chased up on top of your car by a frickin' striped mole. They are potentially quite vicious animals, capable of fighting off coyotes and other larger creatures, and are similar to wolverines, which are really nasty critters, ones that wolves won't even try to kill. But nevertheless, how does it maul five people? Doesn't anyone own a gun? Or a pitchfork? Or even a shovel? Humans are inexplicably forgiving of animal attacks, these days. I can see if it's your own pet biting you, but if some strange/wild animal comes after you, especially if you aren't out in the wild scaring its babies, you have to take action, and generally put it out of its misery. And if it bites you, you have a responsibility to kill it, if you can't trap it. The next person to come along might be a little kid, and the vicious animal would probably kill or maim them. I'm not sure of the legality of things, though I'm sure a lawsuit could result, but if someone's little yapping dog bites you, I recommend you punt the little fucker. Stomp it to death, whatever. Bigger ones you might need a weapon to avoid taking collateral damage, but I'm not real forgiving of animals attacking my person. I remember when I was 12 or 13 and living in Arlington, Texas, some neighbors in the suburbs had two medium sized dogs that were forever running loose in front of their home, in defiance of the city leash laws. They'd run after kids on bikes and bark and bark, and rumor had it they'd occasionally give someone a nip. I found it funny when they'd do it to me, and I'd laugh and occasionally kick a back tire sideways whacking one, if it got too close. Eventually and inevitably someone got bitten, and there was a legal wrangle about putting the mutt to sleep. During that time, the other dog ran after a motorcycle and got flattened somehow. I don't remember what happened to the biting dog, but I always hoped they would gas it. I have no problem with people owning dogs, but if they can't control the animals, then they have no right to complain if someone takes offense to the animal and puts it down. You're out in public and some potentially rabid and dangerous animal runs at you, you can't be blamed for assuming the worst and taking appropriate self-defense measures. Another story that always cracks me up: When my grandparents used to live out in the country in Missouri, after they were retired, they'd go for walks in the early morning (the only time of day it's less than about 93º there in the spring/summer/fall) to get some exercise. Lots of the farmers (and assorted white trash) in the area had big hound dogs, most of whom were friendly, and many of whom were running around loose all the time. Not uncommon to see packs of 15 or 20 dogs running around the countryside all day there. Anyway, one particular property had 4 or 5 big barking hound/watch dogs, who would throw themselves at a fence chain link fence alongside of the road anytime any human or vehicle came along it. My grandparents carried stun guns on their morning walks, or sometimes chemical mace, since there were some wild dogs out there as well as the mostly friendly pet ones. One day when they came up to the barking dog fence, two of the dogs had somehow gotten out, and were lying beside the road, while their comrades still inside the fence were doing their usual running and pacing and barking. The two loose ones leaped to their feet and began snarling and barking and looking very aggressive. My grandparents know how to deal with that sort of problem though, and once the dogs got too close, they tazer'ed them, then hit them again once they were down, and while they were still stunned my granddad picked them up one at a time and literally threw them back over the 8" chain link fence. I never fail to laugh myself into a coughing fit when I think of that scene. Given that both my grandparents have been hunters for 40 or 50 years, and own dozens of hunting rifles and several handguns, I'd say the dogs got off pretty lightly. |
||||||
| Back to the Articles Index. |
|
All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007. |