BlackChampagne Home

In association with Amazon.comBuy Crap! I get 5%.
Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted.

Site Information
--What is Black Champagne?
--Cast of Characters & Things
--Your First Time.
--Design Notes
--Quote of the Day Archive
--Phrase of the Moment Archive
--Site Feedback
--Contact/Copyright Info

Blog Archives
--Blogger Archives: June 2005-
--Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005

Reviews Section
Movie Reviews (153)

Ten Most Recent Film Reviews:
--Infernal Affairs -- 5.5
--The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6
--The Limey -- 8
--The Descent -- 6
--Oldboy -- 9.5
--Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7
--Mission Impossible III -- 7.5
--V for Vendetta -- 8.5
--Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8
--Night Watch -- 7.5

Book Reviews (76)
Five Most Recent Book Reviews:
--Cat People -- 4
--Attack Poodles -- 5
--Caught Stealing -- 6
--The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5
--Harry Potter #6 -- 7

Photos Section
--Flux Photos
--Pet Photos (7 pages)
--Home Decor Photos
--Plant Photos
--Vacation Photos (12 pages)

Articles
See all 234 articles here.

Fiction
Original horror and fantasy short stories.

Mail Bags
Index Page

Features
--Links
--Slang: Internet
--Slang: Dirty
--Slang: Wankisms
--Slang: Sex Acts
--Slang: Fulldeckisms
--Hot or Not?
--Truths in Advertising

Band Name Ratings
(350 Rock Bands Listed)
FAQ -- Feedback
A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z

Hellgate: London
--The Unofficial HGL Site
--The Hellgate Wiki

Diablo II
--The Unofficial Site
--Flux's Decahedron
--Middle Earth Mod

Locations of visitors to this page

Powered by Blogger.

BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Movies, Past, Present and Future



Friday, July 15, 2005  

Movies, Past, Present and Future


Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is opening this weekend, and getting good reviews. It's at 73% approval on Metacritic, and 83% positive on Rotten Tomatoes. The odd part is that it's getting some of those scores in spite of Johnny Depp's performance, which most people assumed would make or break the film. Ann Hornaday of the Washington Post gave it the lowest score of any major reviewer, and said of Depp:
There's a smidgen of Mr. Rogers here, a bit of Dana Carvey's Church Lady there; the exaggerated top hat, foppish coat and waxy green pallor suggest a creature worthy of Dr. Seuss, and those prosthetic choppers can't help but recall Depp's own performance as the title character in Burton's 1994 movie "Ed Wood." And that hair--a lacquered pageboy with wisps of Mamie Eisenhower bangs -- that hair can bring to mind only one person these days, and that's the currently incarcerated New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

The cumulative effect isn't pretty. Nor is it kooky, funny, eccentric or even mildly interesting. Indeed, throughout his fey, simpering performance, Depp seems to be straining so hard for weirdness that the entire enterprise begins to feel like those excruciating occasions when your parents tried to be hip. If you have to try that hard, you just aren't.
Ebert liked the film enough to give it 3/4 stars, but his approval came about despite Depp's performance, which is compares to just one existing celebrity -- one no one wants to be compared to.
Johnny Depp may deny that he had Michael Jackson in mind when he created the look and feel of Willy Wonka, but moviegoers trust their eyes, and when they see Willy opening the doors of the factory to welcome the five little winners, they will be relieved that the kids brought along adult guardians. Depp's Wonka -- his dandy's clothes, his unnaturally pale face, his makeup and lipstick, his hat, his manner -- reminds me inescapably of Jackson (and, oddly, in a certain use of the teeth, chin and bobbed hairstyle, of Carol Burnett).
We'll likely see it this weekend anyway, so stay tuned for my oh-so-important critical reaction.

Speaking of critical reaction, I've recently watched The Incredibles twice on DVD (once in San Diego with dad, once here while bored in the late afternoon heat) and it's really grown on me. Looking back at my original review I see that I gave it an 8, but more because I thought I should than because I really enjoyed it. I appreciated the quality and intelligence of it then, but didn't really connect with the characters on an emotional level. I now do, while appreciating the rest of it even more, and really can't say enough about it. The action sequences are genius, the characters are smart and realistic, and the actual acting performances, animated though they are, are really quite brilliant. Watch virtually any conversation scene in the film and really study their body language, facial expressions, and so on. Better than real humans can do them, for the most part.

Inspired by The Incredibles, I finally got around to watching Finding Nemo again. I wrote about it last year when I saw it for the first time on DVD, but never put up an actual review. Well, there's one up now, and happily I liked the movie a lot more the second time through. I don't love it, mostly because it's just too aimed for children to give me that much adult satisfaction, and I wish there was more to the plot than Marlin and Dotty's endless roadtrip, but I'm sure kids worship the film, and it's good enough for adults to sit through as well.

Finally, I must admit that the constant barrage of "Coming this Tuesday!" TV ads for the Constantine DVD (18 minutes of bonus footage!) are starting to work on me. I was surprised at how much I liked the film when I saw it in the theater last year, I especially loved the glorious imagery, and since that's what the commercials are ladeling on, I'm itching. Buying it new would be foolish, since it'll be used at Blockbuster in a month for half price, and since we've got 2 DVDs here now we haven't seen yet, plus the Chocolate Factory movie this weekend... And yet my urge to possess it forthwith is, like all desires, essentially untrammeled by logic or rationality.
Comments:

The trailers for Charlie and the Chocolate Factory show exactly what the reviews you are quoting say. I know that not everyone in the world, especially children today, have seen the original movie, maybe it will seem new and fresh to them?

My wife is still creeped out by the performance of Gene Wilder in the original movie. The majority of the creepiness is that Wilder doesn't try to do an over-the-top caricature for the role, he is just a guy, any guy, who happens to be extremely eccentric. Wilder does have the crazy hair and pale eyes at his disposal which probably makes it easier but, he still looks human.

I can judge only by the trailers as I have yet to see the film but, my guess is that Depp was trying to combine Edward Scissorhands with the smooth clay Gumby figure when he was acting it out. Of course it should also be noted that he might have stolen the teeth directly from Mr. Ed.

I hope that I enjoy it when I do see it, but if the trailers are representative of the rest of the film I really doubt that will be a possibility.


 

Post a Comment << Home

Archives

May 2005   June 2005   July 2005   August 2005   September 2005   October 2005   November 2005   December 2005   January 2006   February 2006   March 2006   April 2006   May 2006   June 2006   July 2006   August 2006   September 2006   October 2006   November 2006   December 2006   January 2007   February 2007   March 2007   April 2007   May 2007   June 2007   July 2007   August 2007   September 2007  

All site content copyright "Flux" (Eric Bruce), 2002-2007.