BlackChampagne.com -- No longer new; improvement also in question.

BlackChampagne Home Buy Crap! I get 5%. Direct donations to cover hosting expenses are also accepted. Site Information --What is Black Champagne? --Cast of Characters & Things --Your First Time. --Design Notes --Quote of the Day Archive --Phrase of the Moment Archive --Site Feedback --Contact/Copyright Info Blog Archives --Blogger Archives: June 2005- --Old Monthly Archives: Jan 2002-May 2005 Reviews Section Movie Reviews (153) Ten Most Recent Film Reviews: --Infernal Affairs -- 5.5 --The Protector/Tom Yum Goong -- 6 --The Limey -- 8 --The Descent -- 6 --Oldboy -- 9.5 --Shaolin Deadly Kicks -- 7 --Mission Impossible III -- 7.5 --V for Vendetta -- 8.5 --Ghost in the Shell 2 -- 8 --Night Watch -- 7.5 Book Reviews (76) Five Most Recent Book Reviews: --Cat People -- 4 --Attack Poodles -- 5 --Caught Stealing -- 6 --The Dirt, by Motley Crue -- 7.5 --Harry Potter #6 -- 7 Photos Section --Flux Photos --Pet Photos (7 pages) --Home Decor Photos --Plant Photos --Vacation Photos (12 pages) Articles See all 234 articles here. Fiction Original horror and fantasy short stories. Mail Bags Index Page Features --Links --Slang: Internet --Slang: Dirty --Slang: Wankisms --Slang: Sex Acts --Slang: Fulldeckisms --Hot or Not? --Truths in Advertising Band Name Ratings (350 Rock Bands Listed) FAQ -- Feedback A -- B -- C -- D -- E -- F -- G -- H -- I -- J -- K -- L -- M -- N -- O -- P -- Q -- R -- S -- T -- U -- V -- W -- X -- Y -- Z Hellgate: London --The Unofficial HGL Site --The Hellgate Wiki Diablo II --The Unofficial Site --Flux's Decahedron --Middle Earth Mod
	BlackChampagne -- no longer new; improvement also in question.: Baseball thought Saturday, June 04, 2005 Baseball thought I never write about baseball, and I may never write about it again after this entry, and you might already be skipping this one just in case. So I'll try to be brief, and this isn't actually about any specific baseball team or player. My thought is actually about the hitting with "Runners in Scoring Position" issue, henceforth to be abbreviated to RiSP. RiSP simply means you are batting with a baserunner on second and/or third base, where they are, in theory, in scoring position; I.E. they'll get to home plate ahead of a throw if the batter gets a hit. Hits in that situation are very useful, since obviously enough, the object of baseball is to score more runs than the other team scores. There may also be a runner on first, but that's not considered "scoring position" since they can't score from there unless the batter hits a double or triple or homerun. The logic seems to be that a batter can be expected to stroke a single with a RiSP, but that more than that is luck. Anyway, the situation stuck in my mind since the batter, Dave Roberts, was doing very well with RiSP this season, and he was 12 for 25 or something like that. In the bit of game I saw, he came up with men on first and third and no one out, and got a hit. Unfortunately, it was a little bouncing bunt type thing that just crawled past the pitcher. Roberts reached first on it, the man on first went to second, but the man on third did not head for home, since he couldn't be sure the pitcher wouldn't get to the hit and throw him out at home plate. My question was, does that count as a hit and a success with RiSP? I mean yeah, technically it's a hit, and there was a runner on third, IE in scoring position... but he didn't score! He wasn't out, and Roberts kept the inning going, but should a batter be credited with a hit and success in that situation when the runner didn't actually score? After all, the whole reason they keep track (unofficially or otherwise) of hitting with RiSP is because it's assumed said runners will score if there's a hit. The whole record keeping is suspect anyway, since in theory you could bat ten times with a man on third and less than two outs, hit a sacrifice fly nine times, strike out the other time, and on the year you'd be 0-1 with 9 RBIs when batting with RiSP. And it's clearly a pretty janky stat, when you take it to that extreme. Of course most of them are. Posted by: Flux # 10:31 PM Comments: Batting average with RiSP is another "conventional" stat that is about cherry-picking an arbitrary small sample size to make a better story. In this case, is the hitter "clutch" or not. Another one I've seen a lot this year is "late hitting." What are hitters averages in the 7-9th innings? Of course, typically, since you're getting a home team broadcast, they only put up this stat for the home players that are doing well and only for the opposing players who aren't. Team RiSP can help explain why teams are losing close games, but it usually evens out over the course of a season. For one batter I think it's meaningless. Go Cubs! #: 10:17 AM posted by Aahzmadius Post a Comment << Home Archives May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 November 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 August 2010 February 2011

Archives